D028 Task 2 Communicable Outbreak Presentation Example

This D028 Task 2 example is a ten-slide presentation with speaker notes that assesses a composite cluster of Legionnaires' disease in a small town after a community hospital admits four adults with pneumonia in six days. WGU D028, Advanced Health Assessment for Patients and Populations, asks MSN students in this task to apply outbreak investigation to a communicable disease. The sample writes a case definition with clinical, laboratory and epidemiologic criteria, walks through the steps of an investigation, and describes passive and active surveillance. It explains transmission through the epidemiological triangle, calculates cumulative incidence for a downtown population of about 6,200 at risk, traces the source to a hotel cooling tower, sets primary and secondary prevention and describes the nurse's role in continued surveillance.

CourseD028 Advanced Health Assessment for Patients and Populations
TaskTask 2
Paper typeOutbreak assessment presentation
LengthAbout 1,200 words, 2 pages
FormatAPA 7
SchoolWestern Governors University (WGU)
ProgramMSN
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for D028 Task 2

1

Communicable Outbreak Assessment: A Cluster of Legionnaires' Disease in a Composite Small Town

Student Name

Leavitt School of Health, Western Governors University

D028: Advanced Health Assessment for Patients and Populations, Task 2

Course Instructor

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title slide names the disease, the setting and the kind of assessment, which is how a public health briefing opens. The town and cases are composites, so the presentation can walk through every outbreak step without describing a real community.
2

Slide 1: Overview

A cluster of severe pneumonia in a small town

Eleven cases, two deaths, three weeks in August

How the outbreak was recognized, confirmed, investigated and controlled

Speaker notes: This presentation walks through an outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in a composite town of about 22,000 people. I will follow the standard steps of an outbreak investigation and point out where the advanced professional nurse contributes at each stage.

Slide 2: The Alert

Community hospital admits four adults with pneumonia in six days

All four positive on Legionella urinary antigen testing

Usual baseline: fewer than two cases per year in the county

Speaker notes: The outbreak was first noticed by the hospital's infection prevention nurse, who saw four positive Legionella urine antigen tests in less than a week, compared with a county baseline of one or two cases a year. The nurse reported the cluster to the county health department the same day. Recognizing an excess over the expected number of cases is the first signal of an outbreak, and it often comes from a nurse who is looking at the data every day.

Slide 3: Case Definition

Clinical: pneumonia confirmed by chest imaging

Person and place: lived in, worked in or visited the downtown district within 1 mile of Main Street

Time: symptom onset August 1 to 31

Confirmed: positive urinary antigen or Legionella culture

Probable: clinical and epidemiologic criteria, no confirmatory test

Speaker notes: A case definition sets clear rules for who counts as a case, so everyone searching for cases uses the same standard. It combines clinical criteria with person, place and time. We separated confirmed cases, which have laboratory evidence, from probable cases, which meet the clinical and exposure criteria but lack a test, and suspect cases, which have compatible symptoms and exposure and are still being evaluated. Using categories lets the team act quickly without waiting for every test while still being honest about certainty.

Slide 4: Steps of the Investigation

Prepare the team and establish that an outbreak exists

Verify the diagnosis and define cases

Find cases and describe them by person, place and time

Develop and test hypotheses

Implement control measures, communicate findings and maintain surveillance

Speaker notes: These steps follow the standard outbreak investigation framework used in public health practice (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2012). In reality they overlap: control measures began before the source was proven, because waiting would have allowed more exposures. The team included the county health officer, two public health nurses, the hospital infection prevention nurse, an environmental health specialist and the state epidemiologist.

Slide 5: Surveillance and Case Finding

Passive surveillance: routine laboratory and provider reports

Enhanced active surveillance: daily calls to hospitals, urgent care clinics and laboratories in three counties

Line list: 11 cases (9 confirmed, 2 probable), ages 48 to 83

Ten of 11 had spent time downtown in the 10 days before illness

Speaker notes: Before the cluster, the county relied on passive surveillance, waiting for laboratories and providers to report cases. Once the outbreak was suspected, public health nurses moved to active surveillance, calling every hospital, urgent care clinic and laboratory in the region daily to ask about new pneumonia with positive Legionella tests. Nurses interviewed each patient or family about where they had been in the 10 days before illness. The line list showed that most cases were older adults, several were smokers or had diabetes, and ten had spent time in the downtown district.

Slide 6: Mode of Transmission and the Epidemiological Triangle

Agent: Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1

Host: older age, smoking, chronic lung disease, diabetes, weakened immunity

Environment: warm, stagnant water in building systems that is aerosolized

Transmission: inhaling contaminated water droplets; not spread person to person

Speaker notes: Legionella lives in water and grows best in warm, poorly maintained building water systems such as cooling towers, hot tubs and large plumbing systems. People become infected by breathing in small droplets of contaminated water; one sick person cannot pass it to another, which is an important message for families and hospital staff (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2024). The epidemiological triangle helps explain this outbreak: a virulent agent, a group of susceptible hosts and an environment that allowed the bacteria to grow and spread.

Slide 7: Cumulative Incidence

Population at risk: about 6,200 residents and workers in the downtown district

New cases: 11 during August

Cumulative incidence: 11 / 6,200 = 17.7 per 10,000 in one month

County baseline: well under 0.1 per 10,000 per month

Speaker notes: Cumulative incidence is the number of new cases during a period divided by the population at risk at the start of that period. Using the estimated 6,200 people who lived or worked in the downtown district, 11 cases in August gives a cumulative incidence of about 17.7 per 10,000 for the month. Even allowing for uncertainty in the denominator, since visitors are hard to count, this is far above the county's usual rate and confirms a real outbreak concentrated in one place.

Slide 8: Finding the Source and Controlling It

Hypothesis: a cooling tower on a downtown hotel

Environmental sampling: Legionella found in tower water, matching patient isolates

Control: tower shut down, cleaned and disinfected; water management plan required

Hospital water tested to rule out a second source

Speaker notes: Mapping cases showed them clustered within half a mile of a downtown hotel with a rooftop cooling tower, downwind of it on the prevailing wind. Environmental health staff sampled the tower and found Legionella matching the strain from patients. The tower was shut down, cleaned and disinfected, and the hotel was required to adopt a water management program. Outbreaks like this one are often traced to preventable maintenance failures; a review of outbreaks investigated by the CDC found that every one with enough information had at least one deficiency in water system maintenance (Garrison et al., 2016).

Slide 9: Prevention and Communicating Findings

Primary: water management programs for buildings with cooling towers

Secondary: alert clinicians to test pneumonia patients for Legionella

Tertiary: early appropriate antibiotics and follow-up for survivors

Public message: not contagious; seek care for fever and cough

Speaker notes: Prevention works at three levels. Primary prevention stops exposure, through water management programs in buildings with cooling towers. Secondary prevention finds disease early, which is why the health department sent an alert asking clinicians to test pneumonia patients with downtown exposure. Tertiary prevention limits harm through prompt treatment and follow-up. Public health nurses answered calls from residents, explained that the disease does not spread between people and encouraged anyone with fever and cough to seek care.

Slide 10: Maintaining Surveillance and the Nurse's Role

Enhanced surveillance continued for two incubation periods after the tower was closed

No new cases with onset after September 3

Nurses: recognized the cluster, interviewed cases, found contacts, educated the public, monitored for new cases

Speaker notes: Enhanced surveillance continued for at least two incubation periods, about four weeks, after the source was controlled, and no new cases appeared. Across every step, nurses were central: an infection prevention nurse recognized the cluster, public health nurses interviewed cases and built the line list, and nurses educated patients, families and the public. The advanced professional nurse brings assessment skills to the population level, turning individual patient findings into a pattern that protects a whole community.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Principles of epidemiology in public health practice: An introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics (3rd ed.). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/index.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). About Legionnaires' disease. https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/about/index.html

Garrison, L. E., Kunz, J. M., Cooley, L. A., Moore, M. R., Lucas, C., Schrag, S., Sarisky, J., & Whitney, C. G. (2016). Vital signs: Deficiencies in environmental control identified in outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease, North America, 2000-2014. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(22), 576-584. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6522e1

What the D028 Task 2 instructions ask

The second D028 task asks you to assess a communicable disease outbreak, usually as a presentation with notes. Most versions ask for a case definition, the steps of outbreak investigation, surveillance methods, mode of transmission with the epidemiological triangle, a calculation such as cumulative incidence or attack rate, control and prevention measures, communication of findings and the advanced nurse's role. Your course may supply the outbreak scenario. Either way, evaluators look for sound epidemiologic methods, correct calculations with the formula shown, and control measures that follow from the identified source and transmission route. Many versions also ask how findings would be communicated to the public.

How this D028 Task 2 example is built

The presentation is organized in the order an investigation unfolds. The first slides establish the alert and the case definition, with criteria stated precisely. The investigation steps follow the standard sequence from preparing the team to communicating findings. Surveillance is split into passive and active case finding. The transmission slide places agent, host and environment in the epidemiological triangle. The incidence slide shows the population at risk, the case count and the calculation. The source slide explains the hypothesis and how it was confirmed, and the final slides cover prevention levels, communication and ongoing surveillance, with speaker notes carrying the explanation. The prevention slide separates primary, secondary and tertiary measures.

Where the D028 Task 2 rubric puts the marks

Each D028 Task 2 aspect is rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. A case definition aspect checks that clinical, laboratory and epidemiologic criteria are clear. Investigation and surveillance aspects look for correct steps and methods. A transmission aspect asks for an accurate epidemiological triangle. A calculation aspect wants the right formula applied correctly, with the population at risk defined. Control, prevention and communication aspects look for measures that fit the source. A role aspect asks what the advanced nurse contributes. Evaluators check CDC sources and APA citations, and they expect slides that are readable with notes that explain. Presentations that show the population at risk explicitly, with its source, make the calculation easy to verify, and notes written in full sentences carry the reasoning evaluators need to see.

D028 Task 2 help: what sends it back

Outbreak presentations come back most often because the calculation is wrong or unexplained. State the formula, the numerator, the denominator and the time period. Second, case definitions omit one of the three criteria types; include clinical, laboratory and person, place and time elements. Third, transmission is described generally. Name the agent, host factors and environmental source. Fourth, control measures do not match the source. If the source is a cooling tower, remediation and water management come first. Finally, keep slides brief and put the explanation in the notes, since crowded slides are hard to follow and the notes are where evaluators find your reasoning. Rehearse the notes aloud to check timing.

Get a D028 Task 2 example written to your instructions

Send the D028 instructions and scenario details from your course of study. We write a custom outbreak presentation, slide text and speaker notes, to those exact aspects and return it in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.

More D028 papers

Other Nursing (MSN) sample papers

D028 Task 2 questions, answered

What goes in a D028 outbreak case definition?

Clinical criteria, such as symptoms and laboratory findings, plus person, place and time: who is included, where they were exposed and during which dates. Most definitions also separate suspect, probable and confirmed cases by the strength of the evidence.

How do I calculate cumulative incidence for D028?

Divide the number of new cases during a defined period by the population at risk at the start of that period, and state both the population and the time frame. Multiply by a convenient base, such as 1,000 or 10,000, so the figure is easy to read.

Does the D028 outbreak scenario use a real disease?

The course scenario provides its own details. Model presentations like this one use a different composite outbreak so the structure can be studied without copying the course's scenario; your submission should use the data your scenario provides.

How do I calculate cumulative incidence for D028?

Divide the number of new cases during the period by the population at risk at the start, then express it per 1,000 or 10,000. The sample shows each number on its incidence slide.

Where can I find a free D028 Task 2 sample paper?

The complete outbreak presentation and speaker notes appear above with margin comments. For a presentation on your own outbreak scenario, share the D028 task and the first custom version is free.