| Course | D157 Managing Resources in an Era of Disruption |
|---|---|
| Task | Task 1 |
| Paper type | Healthcare improvement project proposal |
| Length | About 1,200 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 |
| School | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Program | MSN Leadership and Management |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for D157 Task 1
Healthcare Improvement Project Proposal: A Two-Bin Kanban Supply System to End Stockouts and Overstock on a 32-Bed Surgical Floor
Student Name
Leavitt School of Health, Western Governors University
D157: Managing Resources in an Era of Disruption, Task 1
Course Instructor
Month Day, Year
Healthcare Improvement Project Proposal: A Two-Bin Kanban Supply System to End Stockouts and Overstock on a 32-Bed Surgical Floor
The Resource Problem
Supplies are the second largest expense on most inpatient floors after labor, and they are also a daily source of friction for nurses. This proposal concerns a composite 32-bed general surgery floor in a 350-bed community hospital. The floor's supply room is stocked by a periodic automatic replenishment (par) system: a materials technician counts each item twice a day and fills it back to a set level. The system has drifted. Par levels were last reviewed four years ago, before the floor began taking bariatric and colorectal patients, so some items run out daily while others sit untouched until they expire.
Baseline data were collected over the most recent fiscal year and a two-week audit. The floor spent $447,000 on supplies against a budget of $410,000, a variance of $37,000 or 9%. Materials management discarded $6,800 of expired stock from the room, mostly wound care and specialty dressing items. At the same time, charge nurses logged an average of 11 urgent calls per day to central supply for items that had run out, and during two observed four-hour periods, nurses left the patient care area to search for supplies an average of three times each. Time spent searching is time not spent with patients. In a 36-hospital study, only 7.2% of medical-surgical nurses' practice time went to patient assessment and vital signs, and the authors identified work processes and the organization of the floor itself as targets for returning time to care (Hendrich et al., 2008).
Aim
Within six months of launch, the floor will reduce urgent stockout calls to central supply from an average of 11 per day to 3 or fewer, reduce expired supply waste by at least 50%, and bring supply spending to within 2% of budget for the following two quarters, without any increase in nursing time spent on restocking.
The Intervention and Its Evidence
A two-bin kanban system stores each supply item in two identical bins, one behind the other. Nurses take from the front bin. When it empties, they move the empty bin or its card to a collection point, and the back bin slides forward. The empty bin is the replenishment signal: the materials technician scans it, fills it from central stores and returns it to the back. Nobody counts shelves, and the quantity in each bin is sized to cover demand during the time it takes to refill it.
The approach comes from manufacturing but has been studied in hospitals. Rosales et al. (2015) modeled the two-bin system for point-of-use medical supplies and examined how bin sizes and replenishment timing affect stockouts and the workload of restocking, the two variables this project is trying to balance. Studies of supply chains on inpatient floors describe how much of the burden of managing stock falls informally on nurses (Landry & Beaulieu, 2013), and exploratory work on where supplies are located within nursing floors suggests that placement and organization affect how far and how often nurses walk to find them (Bélanger et al., 2018). The two-bin system addresses both: it moves counting off nurses and technicians alike, and redesigning the room at launch is a chance to put high-use items closest to the door.
The system will not work if bin quantities are copied from the old par levels. The project will size each bin from twelve months of usage data for that item, reduce the number of line items where two products serve the same purpose, and label every bin with the item, its reorder quantity and a photograph.
Stakeholders and Roles
The project touches nursing, materials management and finance, and each has a different stake. Nurses want items to be there; materials management wants predictable workload; finance wants the variance closed. The responsibility chart below assigns one accountable role to each major task. I lead the project as the floor's assistant nurse manager.
| Task | Project lead (assistant nurse manager) | Nurse manager | Materials supervisor | Materials technician | Staff RN champions | Finance analyst |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pull 12 months of usage by item | C | I | A | R | I | C |
| Size bins and remove duplicate items | A | C | R | R | C | I |
| Redesign room layout | A | C | C | R | R | I |
| Educate staff on the pull signal | A | I | I | C | R | I |
| Replenish from bin signals | I | I | A | R | I | I |
| Track stockout calls and waste | A | I | C | R | R | I |
| Report spending against budget | C | A | I | I | I | R |
Resources Required
The project's own costs are modest but real, and they are counted here rather than hidden in the savings. Wages are loaded hourly rates from the hospital's current scale.
| Resource | Quantity | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|
| Bins, dividers and printed labels | About 180 item locations, two bins each | $2,600 |
| Materials technician time for sizing and setup | 40 hours at $31 | $1,240 |
| Project lead time outside regular duties | 30 hours at $52 | $1,560 |
| Staff RN champion time | 4 champions, 6 hours each at $48 | $1,152 |
| Staff education, one 20-minute huddle session | 38 nurses at $48 per hour | $608 |
| Room reconfiguration by facilities | One weekend, existing shelving reused | $900 |
| Total project cost | $8,060 |
Financial Case
If the project closes half of the $37,000 variance through fewer duplicate items and less overstock, and halves the $6,800 in expired waste, first-year savings would be about $21,900 against a one-time cost of $8,060, returning the investment in under five months. These are estimates, and the proposal does not depend on them: the stockout and time measures justify the change even if savings fall short. The finance analyst will verify the variance monthly from the general ledger, so the savings figure will be measured, not assumed.
Timeline
Month 1: obtain approval, pull usage data and form the champion group. Month 2: size bins, remove duplicates and order materials. Month 3: educate staff at huddles and reconfigure the room over one weekend; launch. Months 4 to 6: track stockout calls daily, waste monthly and spending quarterly; adjust bin sizes for any item that stocks out twice in a month. Month 6: report results to the director of surgical services and decide whether to extend the system to the neighboring orthopedic floor.
Risks and Responses
Nurses may take from both bins at once, defeating the signal. Response: champions will model the practice for the first month, and the back bins will be placed behind a simple divider. Bin sizes may be wrong for items with seasonal or census-driven demand. Response: the technician will flag any item emptied more than once between rounds, and the project lead will resize it weekly for the first two months. Materials management may lose technician hours if counting disappears. Response: the supervisor has agreed to redirect the saved counting time to restocking accuracy and expiration checks, which protects the position. Finally, a supply disruption at the distributor could empty bins regardless of the system. Response: the materials supervisor will keep a substitution list for the twenty highest-use items.
Fit With the Organization
The hospital's strategic plan commits it to reducing operating expense without reducing time at the bedside. This project answers both halves of that commitment on one floor, with a method that can be measured in six months and extended if it works. It also gives nurses a direct way to see that a daily frustration was heard and acted on.
References
Bélanger, V., Beaulieu, M., Landry, S., & Morales, P. (2018). Where to locate medical supplies in nursing units: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 19(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2018.1433438
Hendrich, A., Chow, M. P., Skierczynski, B. A., & Lu, Z. (2008). A 36-hospital time and motion study: How do medical-surgical nurses spend their time? The Permanente Journal, 12(3), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/08-021
Landry, S., & Beaulieu, M. (2013). The challenges of hospital supply chain management, from central stores to nursing units. In B. T. Denton (Ed.), Handbook of healthcare operations management (pp. 465-482). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5885-2_18
Rosales, C. R., Magazine, M., & Rao, U. (2015). The 2Bin system for controlling medical supplies at point-of-use. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(1), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.041
What the D157 Task 1 instructions ask
The first D157 task asks you to propose a healthcare improvement project focused on managing resources. Most versions ask you to describe the resource problem, set an aim, describe the intervention and its evidence, identify stakeholders and their roles, list the resources required, make a financial case, give a timeline and address risks and fit with the organization. The project may carry into the capstone, so choose one you could realistically complete. Evaluators look for an aim that can be measured, costs that include the project's own time, and a financial case built from real categories of waste or expense rather than general promises of savings.
How this D157 Task 1 example is built
The proposal opens with the problem from the nurse's side and the finance side, which shows why both groups care. The aim sets three numeric targets with a deadline. The intervention section explains the two-bin method clearly enough for a reader who has never seen it and cites studies of hospital supply systems. Stakeholders are described by what each wants. Resources are counted honestly, including wages for champions and materials staff. The financial case uses the floor's budget variance and expired stock to estimate savings, with assumptions stated. A month-by-month timeline and a risk table close the proposal, followed by a paragraph on strategic fit. Assumptions behind each saving are stated beside the figure.
Where the D157 Task 1 rubric puts the marks
D157 Task 1 aspects are each rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. A problem aspect checks that the resource issue is specific and measured. An aim aspect wants targets with dates. The intervention has to rest on published results and suit this floor. Stakeholder and resource aspects ask for roles and a realistic list of needs. A financial aspect rewards savings calculated from stated assumptions. Timeline, risk and organizational fit aspects look for specific plans. Evaluators pay attention to whether the project is feasible for a nurse leader to carry out, and figures drawn from studies should be cited where they appear. A risk table that pairs each risk with a named response is easy to credit.
D157 Task 1 help: what sends it back
Improvement proposals come back most often because the aim is not measurable. Write the target number and the date. Second, the project's own costs are hidden in the savings. Count staff time, materials and training separately. Third, stakeholder sections list departments without saying what each wants or will do. Fourth, financial cases claim the whole variance will disappear. Estimate a realistic share and explain why. Finally, choose a project you can finish. Many students carry this proposal into the capstone, where they must report results, so an ambitious project that cannot be completed in six months creates problems later. Check the timeline against staff vacations and busy seasons.
Get a D157 Task 1 example written to your instructions
Send the Task 1 instructions and rubric aspects from your D157 course of study. We write a custom improvement project proposal to those exact aspects and your chosen problem, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
Other Nursing (MSN) sample papers
- D031 Task 1 Nurse Innovator Sources Table
- C792 Task 2 Entity Relationship Model
- D158 Task 2 Implementation Plan
- D027 Task 2 E-portfolio Reflection
D157 Task 1 questions, answered
Does the D157 project have to be about supplies?
No. Any resource problem works, such as staffing, equipment, space or time. The sample chooses supplies because stockouts and overstock are easy to measure on one floor.
Can D157 budget figures be estimates?
Yes, if each has a stated basis, such as loaded hourly wages or the floor's reported variance. The sample labels its figures and explains how each was calculated.
Will my D157 project continue into the capstone?
Often yes. Many students carry the D157 proposal into D161, where they report results. The sample's two-bin project returns in D161 as a final status report and presentation.
What makes a good aim for D157 Task 1?
A statement with a measure, a target and a date. The sample aims to cut urgent stockout calls from 11 a day to 3 or fewer within six months, alongside waste and spending targets.
Where can I find a free D157 Task 1 sample paper?
The full improvement proposal is on this page with commentary on each section. Send the D157 instructions and your resource problem, and your first custom proposal is free.