| Course | D360 HRM Capstone |
|---|---|
| Task | Task 1 |
| Paper type | Culture and recruiting assessment |
| Length | About 1,100 words, 3 pages |
| Format | APA 7 |
| School | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Program | BS Human Resource Management |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for D360 Task 1
Hired by Word of Mouth, Gone by Spring: Assessing How a Composite Nonprofit Food Bank's Culture Shapes Its Recruiting and Retention, With Recommendations
Student Name
School of Business, Western Governors University
D360: HRM Capstone, Task 1
Course Instructor
Month Day, Year
Hired by Word of Mouth, Gone by Spring: Assessing How a Composite Nonprofit Food Bank's Culture Shapes Its Recruiting and Retention, With Recommendations
The Organization
Harvest Commons Food Bank, a composite nonprofit, was founded 11 years ago by a retired grocer, Martha Ellison, who still serves as executive director. It collects donated and purchased food, stores it in a leased warehouse and distributes it to 70 partner pantries across four rural counties, reaching about 22,000 people a month. It has 38 employees, including 12 warehouse coordinators who manage receiving, inventory and deliveries, 8 drivers, and staff in partner relations, development and administration, plus several hundred volunteers. Its mission is to make sure no one in its service area goes hungry. There is no HR department; the finance manager handles payroll and benefits, and managers hire their own staff.
Current State of Recruiting and Retention
Recruiting is informal. Most openings are filled through personal networks: staff and volunteers suggest friends, the director mentions openings at church and community events, and a notice goes on the food bank's social media page. There are no written job descriptions for most roles, no standard interview process and no consistent onboarding. Pay for warehouse coordinators is about $16 an hour, below the $18 to $19 offered by two distribution centers that opened nearby.
Retention is the larger problem. Over the past two years, 9 of the 12 warehouse coordinator positions turned over, and six of the nine departures came in the first four months on the job. Turnover among drivers was lower, and administrative and development staff have stayed for years. Exit conversations, informal and unrecorded, suggest that new coordinators felt overwhelmed, unsure what was expected and unsupported during the busy fall and holiday season, when donations double.
How Culture Shapes Recruiting and Retention
Organizational culture can be understood at three levels: what can be seen, such as routines and structures; what people say they value; and the deeper assumptions nobody questions anymore, which often trace back to a founder (Schein & Schein, 2017). Harvest Commons' culture is clearest at the level of assumptions.
The first assumption is that commitment to the mission is enough. The food bank was built by people who would do anything for it, and its leaders assume that anyone who cares about hunger will figure out the job. This explains why there are no job descriptions or onboarding: structure feels bureaucratic and unnecessary. It also explains recruiting through personal networks, which bring in people who share the mission but not necessarily the skills to manage inventory for 70 pantries.
The second assumption is that the founder knows best. Decisions flow through the director, and managers rarely act without her approval. New coordinators who ask questions often wait days for answers, which during the holiday season means problems pile up.
The third assumption is that every dollar should go to food, not overhead. This value is admirable and important to donors, but it has kept pay below market and prevented investment in training or an HR function, which in turn drives turnover and its hidden costs.
Strengths to Keep
The culture also has real strengths. The mission inspires loyalty: long-tenured staff describe their work as a calling, and volunteers return year after year. The informal network brings in people who understand the community and its needs. Staff feel like a family, and they help one another during crises. Any changes should protect these strengths rather than replace them with a corporate model.
What Research Suggests
Research on new employees explains why early turnover is so high. Bauer et al. (2007) pooled 70 samples of new employees and showed that three things, knowing clearly what the role requires, feeling able to do it and feeling accepted by the team, largely explain whether early socialization leads to satisfied, committed employees who stay. Harvest Commons' new coordinators have social acceptance, because the staff is welcoming, but they lack role clarity and the confidence that comes from training. Turnover research also shows that people leave for reasons organizations can influence, including the job itself, how they are treated and better alternatives nearby (Hom et al., 2017), and the new distribution centers offer those alternatives.
How the Assessment Was Done
Because Harvest Commons keeps few HR records, the assessment rebuilt the picture from several sources. Payroll records gave start and end dates for every employee over three years, which produced the turnover figures. Interviews with the director, the operations manager, four current coordinators and two former coordinators who agreed to talk explained how hiring and the first weeks on the job actually work. A short anonymous survey of all staff asked which things made their first three months easier and which made them harder. Finally, a comparison of job postings from nearby employers showed the pay and schedules coordinators could get elsewhere. The interviews were especially revealing: every coordinator described learning the job by asking whoever was nearby, and both former coordinators said they left not because of the work, which they believed in, but because they never felt they knew what they were doing.
Recommendations
First, write simple job descriptions for every role, starting with warehouse coordinators, stating duties, the skills needed and how success is measured, so that recruiting targets the right skills and new hires know what is expected.
Second, keep network recruiting but add structure: post openings on regional job boards and with the workforce center, and use a short structured interview with the same questions for every candidate.
Third, create a 90-day onboarding plan: a written checklist, a peer buddy, a week of shadowing before working alone and weekly check-ins with the operations manager. Avoid starting new coordinators in October, when the holiday rush begins, where possible.
Fourth, delegate decisions: give the operations manager authority over warehouse staffing and daily decisions so that new staff get answers quickly.
Fifth, raise coordinator pay to $18 over two years, presenting it to the board and donors as an investment in reliable distribution, since each coordinator who leaves costs time, errors and lost food.
Harvest Commons will track 90-day and one-year retention, time to fill and new hires' confidence at 30 and 90 days.
Conclusion
Harvest Commons' recruiting and retention problems grow from a culture that assumes commitment is enough, routes decisions through its founder and avoids spending on overhead. Those assumptions built a devoted organization, but they leave new coordinators unclear, unsupported and underpaid. Keeping the culture's strengths while adding clarity, onboarding, delegation and fair pay can turn new hires into long-term staff.
References
Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707-721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530-545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.
What the D360 Task 1 instructions ask
D360 begins with an assessment of culture and its effect on how an organization recruits and keeps people. You usually describe the organization, the current state of recruiting and retention, how culture shapes both, the strengths worth keeping, what research suggests, how you gathered evidence and your recommendations. Evaluators look for a culture analysis that goes beyond stated values to the assumptions behind daily behavior, supported by examples. The link between culture and HR outcomes should be explicit, showing how a belief leads to a practice and then to a result, such as early turnover. Strengths deserve real attention, since a capstone should not treat the organization as all problems. The methods section explains your evidence. Recommendations need to fit the organization's size, budget and culture.
How this D360 Task 1 example is built
The assessment opens with the food bank's founding, its leader and its work with partner pantries. Current recruiting is described plainly: openings filled through friends, church and a social media notice, with no job descriptions and a short orientation. The culture section uses a model with three levels, visible routines, stated values and deeper assumptions, and traces each assumption to a recruiting or retention problem. Strengths follow, including a mission that inspires loyalty and a network that brings in people who know the community. A research section uses a meta-analysis on newcomer adjustment to explain why new coordinators leave. The methods section describes payroll records, interviews and a staff survey. The paper ends with five recommendations, and the notes show which rubric aspect each one answers.
Where the D360 Task 1 rubric puts the marks
D360 Task 1 aspects are scored competent, approaching competence or not evident. An organization aspect asks for relevant background. The current state aspect looks for recruiting and retention described with data, such as turnover by role. A culture aspect rewards analysis that uses a recognized model and reaches underlying assumptions. The connection aspect checks that culture is linked to specific HR outcomes. A strengths aspect wants positives identified and preserved. The research aspect expects scholarly findings applied to the organization. A methods aspect asks how evidence was collected. Recommendation aspects look for practical actions that follow from the analysis. The paper is also read for organization and APA citations, and evaluators credit an assessment that respects the organization while being honest about its problems.
D360 Task 1 help: what sends it back
Culture assessments lose marks when they describe values from a website and stop there. Reach the assumptions that explain what people actually do. Another common gap is naming culture as the cause without showing how, so trace each belief to a practice and a result. Some papers see only problems; identify strengths and explain how your recommendations protect them. Data can be thin in small organizations, so explain how you rebuilt it from records and interviews. Research sometimes appears as a quotation with no application; use it to explain your findings. Recommendations may be too costly or formal for a small nonprofit, so scale them to its budget and staff. Keep the founder's role in view, since founders shape culture deeply.
Get a D360 Task 1 example written to your instructions
Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D360 course of study. We write a custom culture and recruiting assessment to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
More D360 papers
Other Business (BS) sample papers
- QHT1 Task 2 Complaints and Efficiency Plan
- D647 Task 2 KPI Evaluation and Recommendations
- D177 Task 2 Brand Crisis Recovery Plan
- D081 Task 1 Culture and Market Entry Analysis
D360 Task 1 questions, answered
How is culture assessed in D360?
With a recognized model and evidence from the organization. The sample uses three levels of culture, from visible routines to unspoken assumptions, and draws on records, interviews and a staff survey.
Is the D360 food bank real?
No. Harvest Commons Food Bank and its founder are fictional. The culture model and newcomer adjustment research cited are real, and your own capstone should assess an organization you can study.
Must D360 Task 1 include data?
Yes, where you can gather it. The sample rebuilds three years of turnover from payroll start and end dates, because the food bank kept few HR records.
Should D360 Task 1 include strengths?
Yes. The sample keeps the food bank's mission-driven loyalty and community network, and shapes its recommendations so that new structure does not undo what already works.
Where can I find a free D360 Task 1 sample paper?
The food bank culture and recruiting assessment appears above with margin notes. Describe the organization you are assessing, and your first custom D360 paper can be written free.