| Course | D406 Health Literacy for the Client and Family |
|---|---|
| Task | Task 1 |
| Paper type | Family health literacy resource |
| Length | About 1,300 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 |
| School | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Program | BS Health and Human Services |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for D406 Task 1
Five Things to Do Every Day: A Plain-Language Home Oxygen Guide for a Father With COPD and the Daughter Who Helps Him, With the Reasoning Behind Its Design
Student Name
Leavitt School of Health, Western Governors University
D406: Health Literacy for the Client and Family, Task 1
Course Instructor
Month Day, Year
Five Things to Do Every Day: A Plain-Language Home Oxygen Guide for a Father With COPD and the Daughter Who Helps Him, With the Reasoning Behind Its Design
The Client and Family
Harold Beck is a composite 72-year-old widower with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). After a hospital stay for a flare of his disease, his lung specialist prescribed oxygen at home at 2 liters per minute through a nasal cannula, day and night. A supplier delivered a stationary oxygen concentrator, a long tube and portable tanks for trips out of the house. Mr. Beck left school after the eighth grade to work on road crews, reads slowly and says he "never was much for paperwork." He smoked for 50 years and quit last spring, and he heats his living room with a wood stove. His daughter Tina lives ten minutes away, works days as a school bus driver and stops by each evening. His 15-year-old grandson visits on weekends.
At discharge, Mr. Beck received eleven pages of printed instructions from the hospital and a nine-page manual from the supplier. When the home health nurse visited, the pages were still in the bag. He told her, "I figured Tina would read it." Tina said she had skimmed it but was not sure what mattered most.
Assessing Health Literacy Needs
Limited health literacy is common, and it is most common among older adults. In the last national assessment of adult health literacy, about 36% of American adults had basic or below basic skills, and adults 65 and older had lower average health literacy than any younger age group (Kutner et al., 2006). Mr. Beck's schooling, his comments and the unopened pages all suggest limited literacy, and the nurse confirmed it by asking him to read the dial on the concentrator and tell her what the number meant. He read it correctly but did not know whether 2 was a little or a lot, or whether he could turn it up when he felt short of breath.
The assessment identified four needs. Mr. Beck needs a small number of actions he can remember, not explanations. He needs numbers shown as pictures, because the flow setting is a number he must match. He needs the fire risk made concrete, because he lives with a wood stove and a history of smoking. And Tina needs to know which problems require a call and to whom, since she is the one who will notice them. The grandson, who may be alone with his grandfather on weekends, needs to know the fire rules too.
The Resource: Your Oxygen at Home
The resource is a single page, printed large, for the refrigerator door. Its full text follows.
Your oxygen at home: 5 things to do every day.
1. Keep it on. Wear your oxygen all day and all night. Even when you feel fine. Your body needs it when you sleep.
2. Check the number. The dial should point to 2. [Picture of the dial with the ball at 2.] Do not turn it up. Do not turn it down. If you feel short of breath, sit down and call your nurse.
3. No fire near your oxygen. Stay 10 feet from the wood stove. That is about 3 big steps. No smoking in the house. Not you. Not anyone. [Picture of a lit match with a red line through it.] Oxygen makes fire burn fast and hot.
4. Watch the tube. Keep the tube out of doorways. Do not trip on it. If it gets a kink, the air stops. Straighten it.
5. Keep a spare. Keep one full tank by the door. If the power goes out, use the tank. Call the oxygen company.
Call the nurse if: your lips or fingers look blue, you are more short of breath than usual, or you feel very sleepy or mixed up. Call 911 if you cannot catch your breath or there is a fire.
Nurse: [number]. Oxygen company: [number].
Why the Resource Is Designed This Way
Five actions, not every fact. The hospital and supplier documents were accurate but covered dozens of topics. The guide keeps only the actions that prevent the most serious harm: low oxygen from not wearing it, the wrong flow setting, fire, falls over the tubing and loss of oxygen in a power outage. Everything else can be taught in person over several visits.
Plain words and short sentences. Most lines are under ten words, use one or two syllables and give one instruction each. The resource avoids terms such as liters per minute, concentrator and cannula, and calls things what the family calls them: the dial, the tank, the tube. Run through the Flesch-Kincaid formula, the guide's text scores below the third-grade level, well below the sixth- to eighth-grade range usually recommended for patient materials.
Pictures for numbers and danger. The dial is shown with the ball at 2, so Mr. Beck matches a picture rather than interpreting a number. The fire rule has its own symbol because it is the rule with the most severe consequences.
Repetition and specifics for the fire rule. Home oxygen fires are a growing problem: a national review found injuries from oxygen therapy fires increasing by about 14% per year over a decade, and common household ignition sources can start fires that burn hotter and spread faster in oxygen-rich air (Klas et al., 2026). A review from a Swedish expert taskforce identified smoking as a major burn and fire risk for people on home oxygen and recommended that smoking be assessed and addressed whenever home oxygen is considered (Ahmadi et al., 2024). The guide therefore says no smoking by anyone, not only by Mr. Beck, and translates 10 feet into 3 big steps, a distance he can picture in his own living room.
Cultural and Family Fit
The Beck family speaks English and values independence, and Mr. Beck dislikes being told what to do. The guide is therefore written as instructions to him, in the second person, rather than as rules for his caregivers, and it avoids warnings that sound like blame about his smoking history. Tina asked for a line telling her when to worry, so the call list is written for anyone in the house. The page lists the nurse's and supplier's numbers, since in a crisis the family is unlikely to look them up in a manual.
Confirming Understanding With Teach-Back
Giving the guide is not the end of the teaching. The nurse would use teach-back, asking Mr. Beck and Tina to explain each action in their own words or show it, then clarifying and asking again until each can do so. In a systematic review of 20 studies, teach-back was effective in 19, with benefits ranging from better knowledge recall to fewer hospital readmissions and better quality of life (Talevski et al., 2020).
In practice, the nurse would ask Mr. Beck to point to where the ball on the dial should be, to walk three steps from the stove and to show what he would do if the power went out. She would ask Tina which changes mean a call and which mean 911. She would ask the grandson, on a weekend visit, why no one may smoke in the house. Any answer that is wrong or uncertain tells the nurse which line of the guide to teach again, and possibly which line to rewrite.
Conclusion
Mr. Beck was given twenty pages of accurate information and used none of it. A one-page guide that his family can read in a minute, built around five actions, pictures and a clear call list, and confirmed through teach-back with each person who shares his home, gives him a far better chance of staying safe on oxygen. The same approach applies to any family: begin with what they need to do, write it the way they speak and check that they can do it.
References
Ahmadi, Z., Björk, J., Gilljam, H., Gogineni, M., Gustafsson, T., Runold, M., Ringbæk, T., Wahlberg, J., Wendel, L., & Ekström, M. (2024). Smoking and home oxygen therapy: A review and consensus statement from a multidisciplinary Swedish taskforce. European Respiratory Review, 33(171), 230194. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0194-2023
Klas, K. S., Coffey, R., Sheckter, C. C., Savetamal, A., & Wibbenmeyer, L. (2026). Preventing oxygen therapy-related fires and burn injuries: A comprehensive national strategic approach. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 47(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf125
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of America's adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Talevski, J., Wong Shee, A., Rasmussen, B., Kemp, G., & Beauchamp, A. (2020). Teach-back: A systematic review of implementation and impacts. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0231350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231350
What the D406 Task 1 instructions ask
The first D406 task asks you to create a health literacy resource for a client and family and explain its design. The task usually wants a portrait of the client and family, an assessment of their health literacy needs, create the resource, explain how it applies plain language and design principles, address cultural fit and describe how understanding will be confirmed. The resource itself is part of the submission. Evaluators look for a resource written at an appropriate reading level with a clear purpose, design choices justified by health literacy principles, and a plan to check understanding rather than assuming it. A long handout that covers everything will not meet the plain language aspects.
How this D406 Task 1 example is built
The paper begins with the client's situation and why earlier materials failed him. The needs section uses national data and the client's own habits to set the reading level and format. The full resource appears in the paper, short enough for a refrigerator door. The design section explains each choice: five actions instead of every fact, large type, one idea per line and familiar words. The cultural section adjusts tone for a man who dislikes being told what to do. The teach-back section describes how the nurse would ask the father and daughter to explain each action in their own words, citing research on teach-back. The design section explains every choice in one or two sentences.
Where the D406 Task 1 rubric puts the marks
D406 Task 1 aspects are rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. A client aspect checks for a description of the family and situation. A needs assessment aspect rewards health literacy needs identified with evidence. A resource aspect looks for plain language, clear organization and an appropriate reading level. A design rationale aspect asks for choices explained with principles. A cultural aspect wants the resource fitted to the family. A confirmation aspect asks how understanding will be checked. Evaluators often test readability, so a resource with short sentences and common words fares better than one that simply looks attractive. Evaluators notice when the resource's reading level is measured and reported rather than asserted.
D406 Task 1 help: what sends it back
Health literacy resources come back most often because they try to say everything. Choose the few actions that matter most and leave the rest to conversation. Second, reading level is claimed but not checked. Use a readability tool and short sentences. Third, design choices are not explained. Tie each to a principle, such as one idea per line. Fourth, cultural fit is generic. Base it on what the family values. Finally, plan teach-back or another method to confirm understanding, since a resource that is never checked may still be misunderstood. Ask someone outside healthcare to read the resource before you submit it.
Get a D406 Task 1 example written to your instructions
Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D406 course of study. We write a custom health literacy resource to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
Other Health and human services sample papers
- D568 Task 3 Health Equity Strategy Analysis
- D396 Task 1 Annotated Bibliography and Essay
- D390 Task 1 Client Support Analysis
- D401 Task 1 Outbreak Analysis
D406 Task 1 questions, answered
What reading level should a D406 resource target?
Aim for plain language that most adults can read on the first pass, with short sentences and everyday words. The sample keeps each line short and avoids medical terms without explanation.
How long should the D406 resource be?
Short enough to be read and used, often one page. The sample limits the guide to five daily actions so a family can read it in a minute.
What is teach-back in D406?
A method where the client explains the information back in their own words so the helper can confirm understanding. The sample plans teach-back for each of the five actions.
Is the D406 family in the sample real?
No. Mr. Beck and his daughter were created to demonstrate the method. The health literacy data and teach-back research that inform the design are published sources. The guide's content is general and not medical advice.
Where can I find a free D406 Task 1 sample paper?
The guide and its design rationale are reproduced above with commentary. Tell us your client's condition in the D406 instructions and the first tailored resource is written free.