| Course | D569 Adult Psychology |
|---|---|
| Task | Task 2 |
| Paper type | Qualitative interview analysis |
| Length | About 1,000 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 |
| School | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Program | BS Psychology |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for D569 Task 2
The Shop on Western Avenue: A Life Story Interview With a Composite Retired Dry Cleaner, Interpreted Through Erikson's Integrity Stage and Socioemotional Selectivity Theory
Student Name
Leavitt School of Health, Western Governors University
D569: Adult Psychology, Task 2
Course Instructor
Month Day, Year
The Shop on Western Avenue: A Life Story Interview With a Composite Retired Dry Cleaner, Interpreted Through Erikson's Integrity Stage and Socioemotional Selectivity Theory
Introduction
Asking an older adult to describe her life offers a view of development that no test can give: which memories she returns to, how she judges her choices and what she wants from the years ahead. This paper reports a qualitative life story interview with a composite older adult and interprets her responses through two theories of adult development, Erikson's psychosocial stage of integrity versus despair and socioemotional selectivity theory. It closes with what the interview suggests about development in later adulthood and the limits of a single interview.
Method
The interviewee, referred to here as Mrs. Park, is 76 and lives with her husband in a small house in Los Angeles. She agreed to a 70-minute recorded interview after being told its purpose, that her name would not be used and that she could skip any question. The interview used eight open-ended questions grouped into three areas: memories of childhood and early adulthood, reflections on the best and hardest years of her life, and hopes for the future. Her answers were transcribed, read several times and coded for recurring themes, which were then compared with the two theories.
Summary of the Interview
Mrs. Park grew up in Seoul after the Korean War, the oldest of four children, and left school at 16 to help support the family. She married at 23, and in 1976 she and her husband immigrated to Los Angeles with one child and very little English. For 31 years they ran a dry cleaning shop on Western Avenue, open six days a week. She raised three children, all of whom finished college. The couple sold the shop in 2008.
Asked about her earliest vivid memories, she described the day the family bought its first radio and the morning she and her husband arrived in Los Angeles and saw palm trees for the first time. Asked about her best years, she answered without hesitation: the late 1980s, when the shop was busy, her children were in school and she knew every customer's name. Her hardest time was 1992, when the civil unrest in Los Angeles damaged many businesses along the corridor and they closed for two weeks, unsure whether they could reopen. About the future, she said she no longer wants to travel or make new friends at the senior center. She wants to spend Sundays with her grandchildren, cook for her husband and see her youngest granddaughter start kindergarten. When asked whether she regretted anything, she said she wished she had finished school, then added, but my children finished, so it is finished.
Theme 1: Integrity Through Reframing
Erikson (1963) proposed that the final stage of psychosocial development involves a tension between integrity and despair. Integrity is a sense that one's life, including its hardships and roads not taken, has been meaningful and acceptable as it was. Despair is regret and a feeling that it is too late to change what matters.
Mrs. Park's answer about school shows the integrity side of this stage in a single sentence. She names a real regret, leaving school, and then reframes it through her children's education, treating their success as the completion of her own story. Her account of 1992 follows the same pattern: she describes the fear honestly, then emphasizes that the family reopened and that customers returned. She does not deny loss, but she places it inside a life she judges worthwhile. For Erikson, accepting the life one has actually lived, rather than the life one might have wished for, is the core of integrity.
Theme 2: Narrowing Goals, Deeper Ties
Socioemotional selectivity theory proposes that people's goals change with their sense of how much time remains. When time seems open-ended, as in youth, people seek information, novelty and new relationships. When time seems limited, they shift toward emotionally meaningful goals and invest in their closest relationships (Carstensen et al., 1999).
Mrs. Park's hopes for the future fit this pattern closely. She explicitly declines new friendships and travel and chooses time with her grandchildren and her husband. This is not withdrawal in a negative sense; she describes these choices with evident satisfaction. The theory also helps explain why she speaks warmly of the shop's regular customers, relationships that were emotionally rich and long-lasting, rather than of the business itself.
Theme 3: Memories From Early Adulthood
Many of the memories Mrs. Park volunteered came from her late teens through her thirties: leaving school, marriage, immigration and the early years of the shop. Research on autobiographical memory has found that older adults tend to recall a disproportionate number of memories from roughly ages 10 to 30, a pattern known as the reminiscence bump (Rubin et al., 1998). This period often contains first experiences and choices that define identity. For Mrs. Park, the bump coincides with immigration, which may explain why arrival in Los Angeles is among her most vivid memories.
Cultural Considerations
Mrs. Park's account is shaped by culture as well as age. Her focus on her children's achievement as her own reflects values of family obligation common in Korean immigrant families of her generation, and her modest description of her own role may reflect cultural norms against self-praise. A theory developed mainly in Western settings may therefore describe her experience in words she would not use, and an interviewer should be careful not to impose them.
Limitations
A single interview captures one day's reflections, and memories are reconstructed each time they are told. Mrs. Park may also have emphasized positive themes because she was speaking to a younger stranger. Interviews over several sessions, or with a family member present, could test the themes found here.
Conclusion
Mrs. Park's life story shows integrity achieved through reframing regret, goals narrowed toward close relationships as time grows shorter, and memory centered on the years that defined her identity. Erikson's final stage and socioemotional selectivity theory together explain much of what she chose to say and what she wants from the years ahead.
References
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). Norton.
Rubin, D. C., Rahhal, T. A., & Poon, L. W. (1998). Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best. Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211366
What the D569 Task 2 instructions ask
The second D569 task asks you to hear an older adult's story and read it through theory. Most versions ask you to conduct or analyze a qualitative interview covering memories, reflections on life and hopes for the future, then interpret the responses using one or more theories of adult development, such as Erikson's psychosocial stages or socioemotional selectivity theory. Some versions provide the interview questions; others let you write them. You are generally expected to describe how the interview was conducted and to protect the interviewee's identity. The analysis should use the person's own words as evidence for each theoretical claim.
How this D569 Task 2 example is built
The paper is arranged as a small qualitative study. The method section covers consent, length, question areas and how the transcript was coded into themes. A summary gives the life story in her own terms, including her best years and her hardest time. Three theme sections follow, each opening with the theory and then quoting or paraphrasing her answers to test it. The integrity theme turns on one reframed regret, the selectivity theme on her plans for Sundays, and the memory theme on the clustering of vivid recollections around immigration. A cultural section qualifies the theories, and a limitations section names reconstruction of memory and the interviewer's presence as reasons for caution.
Where the D569 Task 2 rubric puts the marks
For D569 Task 2 the evaluator works through the aspects one at a time, and each lands at competent, approaching competence or not evident. An interview aspect checks that the interview is described and summarized clearly, with appropriate ethical care. The theory application aspect is central; evaluators look for an accurate explanation of the chosen theory and specific evidence from the interview that fits or complicates it. Some versions add aspects for analyzing individual characteristics or sociocultural factors in the person's development. Evaluators reward interpretation that stays close to the data rather than broad statements about aging. APA citations of the theories and professional writing are also scored. A transcript pasted into the paper without analysis will not meet the application aspect.
D569 Task 2 help: what sends it back
Interview analyses are most often returned when the theory is summarized in one section and the interview in another, with no link between them. Put them together: state the theory's claim, then show what the person said that supports or challenges it. Another problem is choosing a theory that does not fit the interview; if your interviewee is focused on family and the present, selectivity theory may fit better than a stage model. Third, students forget method and ethics. Say how long the interview lasted, what you asked and how you protected privacy. Finally, remember culture. A theory built mostly on Western samples may need qualifying when applied to someone raised elsewhere, and the interviewee's own words for her experience deserve a place beside the theory's terms.
Get a D569 Task 2 example written to your instructions
Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D569 course of study. We write a custom life story interview analysis to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
More D569 papers
Other Psychology sample papers
- D567 Task 1 Social Issue Attitude Analysis
- D571 Task 3 Anxiety and Personality Depictions Analysis
- D571 Task 1 Cultural Abnormality Analysis
- D566 Task 2 Learner Persona Learning Plan
D569 Task 2 questions, answered
Which theories fit D569 Task 2?
Erikson's integrity versus despair, socioemotional selectivity theory and the selection, optimization and compensation model are common choices. The sample uses the first two and adds research on the reminiscence bump.
How long should a D569 interview be?
Your instructions may set a length. The sample describes a 70-minute interview built on eight open questions, which produced enough material for three well-supported themes.
Do I include the full transcript in D569 Task 2?
Usually not, unless your task asks for it. Summarize the interview in your own words and quote the most important answers at the points where they support your analysis.
Is the D569 interviewee real?
No. The interviewee and her answers are a composite written for this sample. Erikson's theory, socioemotional selectivity theory and the memory research are real and cited.
Where can I find a free D569 Task 2 sample paper?
The complete interview analysis appears on this page with margin notes. If you have your own interview, send it along with the D569 instructions and the desk will return a first analysis free of charge.