D575 Task 2 Behavior Change Project Example

This D575 Task 2 example reports a twelve-week behavior change project on sleep regularity, with lights out by 10:45 p.m. on at least six nights a week as the SMART goal. WGU D575, Health Psychology, then has BS Psychology students change one real habit of their own and explain the result with health psychology principles. The sample explains why regular timing matters more than sleep length for this writer, guides the plan with the transtheoretical model and three if-then plans, and describes environmental, time-management, social and reward strategies. Results are reported in phases, including a relapse in the seventh week, with weeknight sleep rising from about five and a half hours to just over seven and headaches falling to about one a week.

CourseD575 Health Psychology
TaskTask 2
Paper typeBehavior change project and reflection
LengthAbout 1,100 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7
SchoolWestern Governors University (WGU)
ProgramBS Psychology
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for D575 Task 2

1

Lights Out at 10:45, Six Nights a Week: A Twelve-Week Behavior Change Project on Sleep Regularity Using the Transtheoretical Model and Implementation Intentions

Student Name

Leavitt School of Health, Western Governors University

D575: Health Psychology, Task 2

Course Instructor

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the target behavior as a measurable rule, then the length of the project and the two theories behind it. The writer and her tracking data are a composite; the research is real.
2

Lights Out at 10:45, Six Nights a Week: A Twelve-Week Behavior Change Project on Sleep Regularity Using the Transtheoretical Model and Implementation Intentions

Introduction

My personal statement of health identified short, irregular sleep as the point where most of my health problems meet: tension headaches, afternoon caffeine, borderline blood pressure and a low tolerance for stress. This paper describes a twelve-week behavior change project aimed at that point. It sets a SMART goal, explains the health psychology theory that guided the plan, describes the strategies used, reports what happened week by week and reflects on the lessons, including the strategies I would drop, keep or add next time.

Target Behavior and SMART Goal

I chose sleep regularity rather than sleep length because the timing of sleep was the part I could control. My children's school start time and my job fix my wake time at 6:15 a.m. My bedtime varied from 11:30 p.m. to 1:15 a.m. on weeknights, and on weekends I slept until nine or later. Research supports focusing on regularity: in a study of undergraduates tracked for 30 days, those with irregular sleep and wake times had lower academic performance and a later circadian rhythm than regular sleepers, even when total sleep was similar (Phillips et al., 2017).

SMART goal: For twelve weeks, I will have lights out by 10:45 p.m. and get up by 6:45 a.m. on at least six of seven nights each week, recorded in a sleep diary each morning. This goal is specific and measurable, achievable because it moves my bedtime about an hour earlier, relevant to the problems identified in my health statement and time-bound at twelve weeks.

What this page is doingThe goal is written so that anyone could check whether it was met on a given night. Goals such as sleep better cannot be measured and are a common reason D575 Task 2 is returned.
3

Theoretical Framework

Transtheoretical model. In the transtheoretical model, people change in steps rather than all at once, passing through precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action and maintenance, and it proposes that different processes of change help at different stages (Prochaska & Velicer, 1997). At the start of this project I was in preparation: I intended to change within the month and had already moved my textbook out of the bedroom. The model guided my strategies. In preparation, commitment and planning matter most; in action, replacing the old behavior and changing the environment matter more; in maintenance, the task is preventing relapse.

Implementation intentions. Good intentions often fail at the moment of action. An implementation intention is a plan in if-then form: when a named cue occurs, a chosen action follows, and a meta-analysis of 94 independent tests found that forming them improved the odds of reaching a goal by a substantial margin (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006). I wrote three: If it is 10:00 p.m., then I close my laptop wherever I am in the chapter. If I want coffee after 2:00 p.m., then I drink sparkling water instead. If I wake up on Saturday before 7:00 a.m., then I get up and take a walk instead of trying to sleep longer.

Strategies

Environmental change: I moved my phone charger to the kitchen and set a smart speaker alarm at 10:00 p.m. labeled Close the laptop. Time management: I moved two study sessions a week to my lunch break and one to early Saturday morning, replacing late-night study hours. Social support: I told my husband my goal, and he agreed to handle the children's last requests after 10:00 p.m. Self-monitoring: I kept a paper diary by my bed recording lights-out time, wake time, headaches and coffee after 2:00 p.m. Reinforcement: each week I met the goal, I set aside $10 toward a weekend away.

Results

Weeks 1 to 3: I met the goal on four, five and six nights. The misses came on nights with a study deadline. Headaches fell from four afternoons in the first week to two in the third. Weeks 4 to 6: I met the goal every week, with six or seven nights on target. I noticed I was falling asleep faster, usually within 20 minutes. My afternoon coffee dropped from three cups to one on most days. The seventh week was a relapse: my son was sick, a course deadline arrived and I met the goal on only three nights. Weeks 8 to 12: I returned to six or seven nights a week. Over the final five weeks, my average weeknight sleep was 7 hours and 10 minutes, compared with 5 hours and 30 minutes before the project. Headaches averaged one afternoon a week. My blood pressure at a pharmacy kiosk during the final week was 121 over 79, though a single reading is not a reliable measure.

Reflection

What worked best was changing my environment and using if-then plans. Closing the laptop at 10:00 p.m. worked because I did not have to decide each night; the plan decided for me. Moving study time was the hardest change and the most important, because late-night study had been the real cause of late bedtimes. The relapse in the seventh week taught me that the transtheoretical model is right to treat relapse as part of the process rather than failure. Instead of abandoning the project, I used the same strategies the next week, and I added a new if-then plan: If a deadline is coming, then I study at lunch for three days before it.

The biopsychosocial loop I described in my health statement also worked in reverse. Better sleep reduced headaches and caffeine, which improved my mood at work, which made the evening routine easier to keep. I am now in the action stage and moving toward maintenance. My plan for the next three months is to keep the diary three nights a week instead of seven, protect the lunch study sessions and review my sleep at the end of each school term.

If I repeated the project, I would begin by moving study time before changing bedtime, since the first three weeks showed that the goal failed only on nights when coursework was still waiting.

What this page is doingThe reflection explains why each strategy worked or failed using the theories named earlier, which is what the rubric means by applying principles of health psychology. A list of results without that explanation leaves the application aspect unmet.
4

Conclusion

A twelve-week project built on a measurable goal, the transtheoretical model and implementation intentions moved my weeknight bedtime earlier by more than an hour and increased my sleep by about an hour and forty minutes, with fewer headaches and less caffeine. The relapse in the middle proved as useful as the successes, because it showed which plans needed strengthening before maintenance.

References

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1

Phillips, A. J. K., Clerx, W. M., O'Brien, C. S., Sano, A., Barger, L. K., Picard, R. W., Lockley, S. W., Klerman, E. B., & Czeisler, C. A. (2017). Irregular sleep/wake patterns are associated with poorer academic performance and delayed circadian and sleep/wake timing. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 3216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03171-4

Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38

What the D575 Task 2 instructions ask

The second D575 task asks you to plan and carry out a change in one of your own health behaviors, then report and reflect on it. Most versions ask for a target behavior, a SMART goal, a health behavior theory that guides your strategies, the strategies themselves, a record of your progress over a set period and a reflection on what worked and what did not. Some versions ask you to connect the project back to your Task 1 statement of health. The project is scored on the application of health psychology principles, so the theory should shape your choices, and your reflection should explain results using the same theory rather than simply reporting them.

How this D575 Task 2 example is built

The paper links the target behavior back to the loop found in the first task and gives a reason, from research, for choosing sleep regularity. The SMART goal is written so any night can be judged met or missed. A framework section places the writer in the preparation stage of the transtheoretical model and quotes three if-then plans in full. Strategies are grouped by type. Results are reported in phases with counts of nights met, headache frequency and coffee intake, and the relapse is described plainly. The reflection explains which strategies worked and why, treats the relapse as information, notes how the health loop reversed and sets a maintenance plan. A short conclusion gives the net change.

Where the D575 Task 2 rubric puts the marks

D575 Task 2 is read against its aspects in turn, with each rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. A goal aspect checks that the target behavior and SMART goal are clear and measurable. A theory aspect asks you to explain a health behavior theory and show how it guided your strategies. A strategies aspect looks for specific actions linked to the goal. A progress aspect asks for results over the full period, and a reflection aspect rewards analysis of what worked, what did not and why, using the theory. Evaluators also look for honesty about setbacks and for a plan to maintain the change. Professional writing and APA citations complete the rubric.

D575 Task 2 help: what sends it back

The most common mistake is a goal that cannot be measured, such as sleeping better or eating healthier. Write it so each day can be scored. Second, theories are often named in the introduction and never used again. Point to the stage or construct that shaped each strategy. Third, results are sometimes reported as a feeling. Keep a simple log and report counts. Fourth, students hide setbacks. A relapse explained with your theory is stronger evidence of learning than a perfect record. Finally, include what you will do next. The course treats behavior change as ongoing, and a maintenance plan shows you understand how changes last.

Get a D575 Task 2 example written to your instructions

Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D575 course of study. We write a custom behavior change project to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.

More D575 papers

Other Psychology sample papers

D575 Task 2 questions, answered

What behavior should I choose for D575 Task 2?

Choose one you can measure daily and that connects to your Task 1 statement of health, such as sleep timing, activity or caffeine. The sample targets bedtime regularity.

Which theory fits a D575 behavior change project?

The transtheoretical model, the health belief model and social cognitive theory are common. The sample pairs the transtheoretical model with implementation intentions, if-then plans shown to improve goal attainment.

How long should a D575 behavior change project last?

Follow your task instructions for the tracking period. The sample reports twelve weeks, long enough to show early progress, a relapse and a return to the goal.

Is the D575 project data in the sample real?

No. The diary entries are illustrative rather than a real person's log. The studies on sleep regularity, stages of change and if-then planning are published and cited.

Where can I find a free D575 Task 2 sample paper?

The full twelve-week report sits above with commentary. Tracking a different habit? Share your log and the D575 instructions; the first tailored report is free.