Send the exact assignment or rubric from your course of study and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. D648 is WGU’s Leveraging AI and Technology in Strategic Communications course. It centers on how AI and emerging technologies are used to create and manage communications, and the ethical guidelines that govern them. Searches like "d648 task 2 assignment example", "D648 sample paper", and "D648 task samples" land on this page.
What D648 is really about
Leveraging AI and Technology in Strategic Communications covers the current state of artificial intelligence, its evolution and its effect on communications. Students explore the ethical implications of using AI and other emerging technologies to create content, learn to use these tools in ethical and innovative ways, lead teams in writing guidelines for AI use in communications, and use communication technology to improve organizational productivity.
Exam items connect a tool to a use and a risk. A question might ask which task generative AI is suited to, such as drafting variations of a headline, and which requires human judgment, such as a statement to families after an accident. Ethics items ask about disclosure of AI-generated content, bias in training data, copyright, privacy of data entered into tools and accuracy. Other items cover collaboration platforms, analytics tools and automation. Because the field changes quickly, the exam emphasizes principles, so learning why a practice is risky matters more than knowing a particular product.
What D648’s tasks ask for
D648 is assessed through an objective exam on the development of AI, its applications in communications, its ethical implications and the use of existing and emerging technology to improve communications.
Why D648 tasks come back for revision
Students often treat AI output as reliable without verification, missing questions about fabricated facts. Ethics questions are missed when students overlook disclosure or the privacy risk of entering confidential information into public tools. Confusing automation, which follows fixed rules, with generative AI, which produces new content, is another slip. Pairing each capability with its main risk in a short table is useful preparation.
The D648 drawers
D648 Task 1 AI use guidelines example
A written version might ask for a team's guidelines for ethical AI use. On request, free, 24-48h.
D648 Task 2 communications technology review example
Evaluating a tool for a communications team is another plausible form. On request, free, 24-48h.
Your course of study shows something else?
Western Governors University revises courses; task counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a D648 sample the right way
Use this shelf to pair each AI use with its safeguards. If your version adds a written AI guidelines task, send the instructions and rubric aspects for a custom sample in 24-48h, the first one free.
How these samples are written
Method, in one line: aspects first, structure from the aspects, artifacts consistent, format exact. Both C-code and D-code spellings resolve here because students search both. Your free request is drafted against what your degree plan actually shows.
D648 questions, answered
Does D648 have a paper?
Students report an objective exam in current versions.
Should AI-generated content be disclosed in D648?
Ethical guidelines generally call for transparency about its use.
What is a hallucination in D648?
A confident but false statement produced by an AI model.