| Course | D914 Healthcare Economics |
|---|---|
| Task | Task 1 |
| Paper type | Financial viability analysis |
| Length | About 1,100 words, 4 pages |
| Format | APA 7 |
| School | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Program | Master of Healthcare Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for D914 Task 1
Four Patients a Night and 41 Days of Cash: A Financial Viability Analysis of a Composite Critical Access Hospital Weighing Conversion to a Rural Emergency Hospital
Student Name
Leavitt School of Health, Western Governors University
D914: Healthcare Economics, Task 1
Course Instructor
Month Day, Year
Four Patients a Night and 41 Days of Cash: A Financial Viability Analysis of a Composite Critical Access Hospital Weighing Conversion to a Rural Emergency Hospital
The Hospital and Its Market
Prairie View Hospital, a composite 25-bed facility with critical access status, serves a rural county of about 9,500 people, 45 miles from the nearest larger hospital. It operates a 24-hour emergency department, a rural health clinic, laboratory and imaging services, and an inpatient unit that also provides swing-bed care, in which patients recovering from a hospital stay receive skilled nursing care in a hospital bed. The inpatient unit averages 3.8 patients a night. The board has asked whether the hospital should convert to a Rural Emergency Hospital, a Medicare designation available since 2023 for small rural hospitals that stop providing inpatient care.
Payment Models and Payer Mix
Prairie View's revenue depends on three payment arrangements. As a critical access hospital, it is paid by Medicare at 101% of its reasonable costs for inpatient and outpatient services, rather than through fixed prospective rates, which protects it when volume is low. Medicaid pays under the state's rules, generally below cost. Commercial insurers pay negotiated rates. Its payer mix is 52% Medicare, 21% Medicaid, 18% commercial and 9% self-pay, so cost-based Medicare payment is the foundation of its finances.
A Rural Emergency Hospital is paid differently. It must stop inpatient care, keep a 24-hour emergency department and may continue outpatient services. Medicare pays for its outpatient services at the prospective payment rate plus 5%, and adds a fixed monthly facility payment, set above $270,000 a month in the program's first year and updated annually. The model trades cost-based payment tied to volume for a guaranteed payment that does not depend on how many patients come through the door.
Financial Viability: Five Ratios
The table compares Prairie View's latest results with benchmarks commonly used by lenders and rating agencies for small hospitals.
| Ratio | Prairie View | Benchmark | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | -5.3% ($24.6M revenue, $25.9M expenses) | 0% or better to sustain operations | Losing money on operations each year |
| Days cash on hand | 41 | 90 or more | Could cover about six weeks of expenses with no new revenue |
| Current ratio | 1.3 | 1.5 to 2.0 | Short-term assets barely exceed short-term obligations |
| Days in accounts receivable | 58 | Under 50 | Cash is slow to arrive, adding to the liquidity problem |
| Debt service coverage | 0.9 | At least 1.25 in most loan agreements | Cash flow does not cover debt payments; loan covenant at risk |
Taken together, the ratios describe a hospital that is not viable on its current path. It loses money on operations, its cash cushion is thin, and it is close to breaching its loan covenant, which would give the lender the right to demand faster repayment. Collecting receivables faster would help liquidity but would not fix the operating loss. Unprofitability, equity decline and insolvency are exactly the signals that a validated rural hospital financial distress index combines, and in that model hospitals rated highest-risk went on to close four times as often as those rated medium-high and 28 times as often as those rated medium-low (Holmes et al., 2017).
The Economics Behind the Losses
Prairie View's problem is largely one of fixed costs. A hospital must staff its inpatient unit with nurses around the clock and maintain its building and equipment whether it has one patient or ten. In an analysis of 2,394 rural hospitals, critical access hospitals had the highest average ratio of fixed to total costs, 80.6%, and higher fixed-cost ratios were consistently associated with financial distress and closure (Karim et al., 2026). Prairie View's estimated ratio of 82% fits that pattern. With inpatient demand falling as residents travel to larger hospitals for elective care and as more procedures move to outpatient settings, each inpatient day carries a larger share of fixed cost. Cost-based Medicare payment softens the problem, but it does not cover Medicaid, commercial or self-pay patients, and it cannot create volume that is not there.
Comparing the Two Options
The table estimates the annual financial effect of converting, based on last year's volumes.
| Item | Estimated annual effect |
|---|---|
| Inpatient acute revenue lost | -$3.4 million |
| Swing-bed revenue lost | -$1.7 million |
| Inpatient nursing, dietary and related costs eliminated | +$4.1 million |
| Change from cost-based to prospective outpatient payment for Medicare | -$0.6 million |
| Monthly facility payment | +$3.3 million |
| Net change in operating results | +$1.7 million |
On these estimates, conversion would move Prairie View from a $1.3 million operating loss to a gain of about $0.4 million, lift debt service coverage above 1.25 and stop the loss of cash. The outpatient line deserves attention: because critical access hospitals are paid on cost, moving to prospective rates could reduce outpatient payment for some services even with the 5% increase, which is why the estimate shows a loss on that line.
The financial analysis is not the whole decision. Conversion would end local inpatient and swing-bed care, so older residents recovering from surgery elsewhere would complete their recovery farther from family, and patients needing admission would be transferred 45 miles. Research on early conversions found that hospitals that converted had low inpatient volumes and revenues, positioning them to benefit financially, but that interviews with rural residents revealed negative perceptions of local care and that many preferred not to use their local Rural Emergency Hospital even when it was available (Van Sandt et al., 2026). A conversion that saves the hospital's finances but loses the community's trust could leave the emergency department with too few patients to sustain even the new model.
Recommendation
Prairie View should convert to a Rural Emergency Hospital within the next 12 months, because its ratios show that the current model is not sustainable and a covenant breach could force a far worse outcome. The conversion should come with three conditions. First, the hospital should sign transfer agreements with two regional hospitals and a partnership with the county nursing home to provide post-acute beds that replace swing-bed care. Second, it should hold community meetings before the board votes, explaining the finances openly and the services that will remain. Third, it should invest part of the facility payment in outpatient services residents want locally, such as infusion and visiting specialty clinics, to keep people using the hospital. The board should review the ratios quarterly after conversion to confirm that the projected gains are real.
References
Holmes, G. M., Kaufman, B. G., & Pink, G. H. (2017). Predicting financial distress and closure in rural hospitals. The Journal of Rural Health, 33(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12187
Karim, S. A., Thompson, K. W., Pink, G. H., & Holmes, G. M. (2026). Fixed-to-total cost ratio is predictive of rural hospital financial distress and closures. The Journal of Rural Health, 42(1), e70123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.70123
Van Sandt, A., Line, K., Gruber, A., Meier, C., Carpenter, C., & Loveridge, S. (2026). Rural emergency hospitals: Emerging patterns of adaptation and community perception. The Journal of Rural Health, 42(1), e70112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.70112
What the D914 Task 1 instructions ask
The first D914 task asks you to analyze a healthcare organization's financial position and recommend a course of action. Expect to describe the organization and its market, explain its payment models and payer mix, calculate or interpret financial ratios, explain the economics behind the results, compare options and recommend one. Figures may be supplied or illustrative. Graders want ratios compared with benchmarks and interpreted, payment models explained accurately, economic reasoning such as fixed and variable costs applied to the case, options costed and a recommendation that weighs finances against community effects. A list of ratios without interpretation, or a recommendation without numbers behind it, falls short of the analysis aspects.
How this D914 Task 1 example is built
The analysis opens with the hospital, its county, its distance from larger hospitals and its services. The payment section explains how each payer pays and what share of revenue each provides. A table compares five ratios with benchmarks, and a paragraph reads them together: operating losses, a thin cash cushion and a covenant close to breach. The economics section explains why a small inpatient unit loses money, since nurses and the building cost the same whether two or ten beds are filled. A second table estimates the effect of conversion on revenue and cost. The recommendation states the choice, the timeline and conditions that protect access, with evidence on how rural hospital closures affect communities.
Where the D914 Task 1 rubric puts the marks
D914 Task 1 aspects are rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. A market aspect asks for the organization's setting and competition. A payment aspect rewards accurate description of payment models and payer mix. A ratios aspect looks for correct calculation or interpretation against benchmarks. An economics aspect wants cost behavior applied to the case. An options aspect asks for alternatives costed. A recommendation aspect looks for a justified choice. Graders check arithmetic and notice when community effects are weighed alongside the numbers, since hospital decisions in rural areas affect access to emergency care, and they expect federal payment rules to be cited accurately. Clear tables with sources for each benchmark help graders check the work quickly.
D914 Task 1 help: what sends it back
Financial analyses in D914 lose marks when ratios appear without benchmarks. Put each next to the standard lenders use. They also lose marks when each ratio is read alone; say what the ratios mean together. Payment rules are often misstated, so check how Medicare pays the type of facility you describe. Options without figures are another weak spot, so cost the change you recommend. Last, the community disappears. Explain what the choice means for patients who depend on the hospital, because an analysis that ignores access reads as incomplete for a healthcare leader. State the source of each benchmark so readers can check it.
Get a D914 Task 1 example written to your instructions
Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D914 course of study. We write a custom financial viability analysis to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
Other Healthcare admin sample papers
- D916 Task 2 Sustainability Plan
- D912 Task 1 Quality Improvement Project Design
- D549 Task 1 Emerging Trend Analysis
- D547 Task 1 ED Data Analysis Presentation
D914 Task 1 questions, answered
What is a Rural Emergency Hospital in D914?
A Medicare provider type, available since 2023, for rural hospitals that stop inpatient care and keep emergency and outpatient services in exchange for a fixed monthly facility payment and higher outpatient rates.
Is the D914 hospital real?
No. Prairie View Hospital and its figures are invented to show the method. The federal payment rules for critical access hospitals and Rural Emergency Hospitals described in the analysis are real.
Which ratios does D914 Task 1 use?
Common measures of profitability, liquidity and debt capacity, including operating margin, the number of days the hospital could pay its bills from cash, and debt service coverage. Each is compared with a benchmark and interpreted.
Why does a small hospital lose money in the D914 sample?
Because most of its costs are fixed. Staffing an inpatient unit around the clock costs nearly the same for four patients as for fifteen, so low volume produces losses.
Where can I find a free D914 Task 1 sample paper?
Both ratio tables and the conversion estimate for the rural hospital are on this page, annotated. Send your D914 organization and its figures, and a first custom analysis is written without charge.