| Course | C204 Management Communication |
|---|---|
| Task | Task 1 |
| Paper type | Workplace communication portfolio |
| Length | About 1,100 words, 3 pages |
| Format | APA 7 |
| School | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Program | MS Management and Leadership |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for C204 Task 1
One Recall, Seven Audiences: A Workplace Communication Portfolio for a Composite Kitchen Appliance Company Recalling the Lid of Its Best-Selling Pressure Cooker
Student Name
School of Business, Western Governors University
C204: Management Communication, Task 1
Course Instructor
Month Day, Year
One Recall, Seven Audiences: A Workplace Communication Portfolio for a Composite Kitchen Appliance Company Recalling the Lid of Its Best-Selling Pressure Cooker
The Scenario and Approach
Brightpan Home, a composite kitchen appliance company with 420 employees, sells the QuickSear 6-quart electric pressure cooker through its website and national retailers. After 31 customer reports that the lid could be opened while contents were still under pressure, including four minor burn injuries, engineers traced the problem to a locking pin from one supplier's production run. Brightpan reported the hazard to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, which requires companies to report within 24 hours of obtaining information that a product may contain a defect that could create a substantial hazard (U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 2012). The company is recalling 88,000 lids and sending customers free replacements.
Each piece below is fitted to its audience and channel. Crisis communication research recommends that responses begin with instructing information, telling people how to protect themselves, and adjusting information, expressing concern and describing corrective action, before any discussion of reputation (Coombs, 2007). All pieces also follow plain language practice: main point first, short sentences, active voice and the reader's own words (Plain Language Action and Information Network, 2011).
Piece 1: Email to All Employees
Subject: QuickSear lid recall: what is happening and what to do today
Team, this morning we announced a voluntary recall of lids on QuickSear 6-quart pressure cookers made between March and June. A faulty locking pin can let the lid open while there is still pressure inside, and four customers have reported minor burns. Customer safety comes first, and we are sending every affected owner a free replacement lid. What you need to do: if a customer or friend asks you about the recall, direct them to our recall page or our customer line; please do not speculate about causes or discuss the recall on social media. Customer care and warehouse teams will receive staffing plans by noon. I am proud of how quickly engineering found the cause, and I know this will be a demanding few weeks. Thank you. Maria Santos, Chief Executive Officer
Piece 2: Email to Retail Partners
Subject: Action required: stop sale of QuickSear lot codes 2403 to 2406
Dear partner, Brightpan is voluntarily recalling QuickSear 6-quart pressure cookers with lot codes 2403 through 2406, printed on the base label. Please stop selling these units today and remove them from shelves and online listings. Brightpan will credit you in full for all returned units and for any customer returns you accept, and we will cover return freight. A prepaid shipping kit and shelf signage will arrive by Thursday. Your account manager will call you within 24 hours to confirm quantities. Thank you for helping us protect our shared customers.
Piece 3: Customer Blog Post
Title: Check your QuickSear lid: free replacement in three steps
If you own a QuickSear 6-quart pressure cooker, please take one minute to check whether your lid is part of our recall. Some lids made between March and June have a locking pin that can let the lid open while there is still pressure inside, which can cause burns. Step one: look at the label on the base for a lot code from 2403 to 2406. Step two: if your code is on that list, stop using the pressure setting. You can still use the slow-cook and sauté settings with the lid off. Step three: request your free replacement lid at our recall page or by calling our customer line. It will arrive within ten days, with free shipping. We are sorry for the trouble and grateful you trust us in your kitchen.
Piece 4: Persuasive Letter to the Supplier
Dear Mr. Okafor, Brightpan and Keystone Components have worked together for seven years, and we value that partnership. I am writing to ask Keystone to share the cost of the QuickSear lid recall. Our engineering analysis, which we shared with your quality team last week, found that locking pins from Keystone's March through June run were machined 0.4 millimeters short of specification, and your own inspection confirmed the variance. The recall will cost about $1.9 million in replacement lids, shipping and retailer credits. We propose that Keystone cover the cost of replacement pins and 50% of the remaining direct costs, and that our teams jointly adopt a first-article inspection for every new production run. Sharing the cost fairly will let us keep sourcing from Keystone with confidence, which we would like to do. I would welcome a call this week to discuss.
Piece 5: Public Reply to a Customer Complaint
Posted in reply to a customer review: "Two weeks and still no lid. Terrible company."
Hi Jordan, you are right to be frustrated, and I am sorry. You should not have had to wait this long. Demand for replacement lids was higher than we planned for, and some orders were delayed. I have found your order, upgraded it to overnight shipping, and it will arrive tomorrow. Until then, please use only the slow-cook or sauté settings with the lid off. I have also added a $25 credit to your account for the inconvenience. If anything else goes wrong, reply here or call me directly at our customer line and ask for Priya. Thank you for your patience.
Piece 6: Social Media Post
Safety notice: Some QuickSear 6-quart pressure cooker lids made March through June are being recalled. Check the lot code on the base. If it reads 2403 to 2406, stop using the pressure setting and get a free replacement lid at the link in our profile. Questions? Our team is here to help.
Piece 7: Brief to the Leadership Team
Subject: Recall status, day 10
Summary: 41% of affected lids have been claimed, above the 30% we projected for day 10. No new injuries have been reported. Risk: replacement lid inventory will run short on day 14 unless Keystone's second shipment arrives on time. Request: approve $120,000 for air freight to close the gap, and approve a second email to registered owners who have not responded. Next update: Monday.
Reflection
The seven pieces share the same facts but differ in what each reader needs first: employees need to know what to say, retailers what to pull, customers how to stay safe, the supplier a reason to share costs, an angry customer an apology and a fix, and executives the decision they must make. Adjusting purpose, tone and channel to each audience is the core skill this portfolio demonstrates.
References
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
Plain Language Action and Information Network. (2011). Federal plain language guidelines. https://www.plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. (2012). Recall handbook. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/8002.pdf
What the C204 Task 1 instructions ask
The first C204 task asks you to write a set of workplace communications for different audiences. You will usually produce several pieces, such as emails, a blog post, a persuasive letter, a response to a complaint, a social media post and a brief for leaders, often around one scenario. Evaluators look for each piece fitted to its audience and channel, a clear purpose stated early, persuasive pieces that use evidence and appeal to the reader's interests, and professional tone throughout, including when responding to criticism. A portfolio in which every piece sounds the same, or in which key actions are buried, rarely clears the communication aspects. Using one scenario, as the sample does, shows how the same facts must be told differently to different readers.
How this C204 Task 1 example is built
The portfolio opens with the scenario and a short explanation of the approach: who needs to know what, when and through which channel. Each piece appears in its real format, with subject lines, greetings and signatures where they belong. The employee email leads with what is happening and what to do today. The retail email names the lot codes in the subject line. The blog post uses plain steps. The supplier letter opens with the partnership before making its request and supports it with test results. The complaint reply apologizes, explains and offers a fix. The social post fits its length. The leadership brief reports status with numbers. Notes explain the choices made in each piece.
Where the C204 Task 1 rubric puts the marks
C204 Task 1 aspects are rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. Audience aspects ask whether each piece fits its reader. A purpose aspect rewards a clear main point early in each piece. A channel aspect looks for format and length suited to the medium. A persuasion aspect wants appeals and evidence in the persuasive piece. A tone aspect asks for professionalism, including in the complaint response. Mechanics aspects cover grammar and formatting. Evaluators notice when each piece could actually be sent as written, and when the portfolio shows range. Consistent facts across pieces, such as the same lot codes and dates, show care. Notes explaining choices help.
C204 Task 1 help: what sends it back
C204 portfolios lose marks when every piece has the same tone. Adjust for each reader: direct for employees, courteous and specific for partners, warm and simple for customers. Key actions are often buried, so put them in the first lines. Persuasive letters sometimes demand rather than persuade; lead with the relationship and support the request with evidence. Complaint replies may be defensive or vague, when readers want an apology, an explanation and a fix. Social posts can run too long for the platform. Last, check that facts match across all pieces, since a different date or lot code in one piece undermines the rest. Read each piece as its reader would.
Get a C204 Task 1 example written to your instructions
Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your C204 course of study. We write a custom workplace communication portfolio to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
More C204 papers
Other MBA sample papers
- D380 Task 1 Email Strategy and Nurture Campaign
- D433 Task 2 Development and Performance Evaluation
- C206 Task 2 Ethics Audit Report
- D263 Task 2 Emotional Intelligence Application
C204 Task 1 questions, answered
How long is each C204 Task 1 piece?
As long as its channel and purpose require. Emails and briefs in the sample run a few short paragraphs, the social post fits a platform limit and the persuasive letter runs about a page.
Is the C204 recall real?
No. Brightpan Home and its pressure cooker recall are made up to illustrate the task. The communication principles demonstrated are standard practice in business writing. Use your course scenario.
Do C204 pieces need citations?
Usually not within the workplace pieces themselves, since real emails and posts do not carry citations. Check your instructions; some versions ask for a reference list for any research you use.
Why use one scenario for C204 Task 1?
It shows how the same facts must be told differently to employees, partners, customers and leaders, which is the skill the task measures. Readers need different details.
Where can I find a free C204 Task 1 sample paper?
All seven recall pieces are reproduced above, each with a note on its audience. Tell us your scenario and required pieces, and your first custom C204 portfolio is free.