D078 Task 2 Entity and Legal Analysis Example

This D078 Task 2 example recommends a legal entity for a composite group of 14 western Michigan farms and food producers that has run an informal Saturday market for nine years and now plans a store and commercial kitchen. Its second task in WGU D078, Business Environment Applications I, has BS Business Management students compare business entities and address the legal and ethical issues of an expansion. The sample explains that the members may already be treated as a general partnership with unlimited personal liability. It compares entities on liability, taxation, governance and raising money, recommends a cooperative under Michigan law with an LLC as the fallback, and covers food safety licensing, employment and lease issues, fairness among members and the order of steps before signing a lease.

CourseD078 Business Environment Applications I: Business Structures and Legal Environment
TaskTask 2
Paper typeBusiness entity and legal analysis
LengthAbout 1,000 words, 3 pages
FormatAPA 7
SchoolWestern Governors University (WGU)
ProgramBS Business Management
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for D078 Task 2

1

From Saturday Stalls to a Year-Round Store With a Kitchen: Choosing a Business Entity and Addressing the Legal and Ethical Issues of a Composite Farmers Market Group's Expansion

Student Name

School of Business, Western Governors University

D078: Business Environment Applications I: Business Structures and Legal Environment, Task 2

Course Instructor

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title describes the expansion that changes the group's legal needs, then names the two parts of the analysis. The market group is a composite; the legal information cited is real and general.
2

From Saturday Stalls to a Year-Round Store With a Kitchen: Choosing a Business Entity and Addressing the Legal and Ethical Issues of a Composite Farmers Market Group's Expansion

The Business and Its Expansion

The Riverside Growers Market, a composite group of 14 family farms and food producers in western Michigan, has run a Saturday farmers market in a church parking lot for nine years. Today it operates informally: members split the costs of the site, insurance and advertising, and one member keeps the books. There is no legal entity, no written agreement and no employees. The group now plans to lease a vacant grocery building, open a year-round store six days a week, hire eight employees and build a commercial kitchen where members will prepare jams, baked goods and ready-to-eat meals. The expansion requires about $420,000 for renovations, equipment and inventory, which members hope to raise partly from their own contributions and partly through a bank loan and a state agricultural grant.

Why the Current Arrangement No Longer Works

When two or more people carry on a business for profit as co-owners without forming another entity, the law generally treats them as a general partnership. Riverside's members may already be partners in the eyes of the law, which means each could be personally liable for the group's debts and for obligations arising from other members' actions on the group's behalf. That risk was small when the group rented a parking lot for a day. It becomes serious with a building lease, a loan, employees and a kitchen producing food for the public. A customer who became ill from a prepared meal could pursue the personal assets of every member, including their farms.

Comparing Entity Options

Three entity types fit Riverside's situation. The comparison considers liability, taxation, governance and ability to raise money, the main factors the federal government identifies in choosing a structure (U.S. Small Business Administration, n.d.).

General partnership: easy and inexpensive to continue, with pass-through taxation, but each partner faces unlimited personal liability. Unsuitable for the expansion.

Limited liability company: protects members' personal assets from business debts and most liabilities, offers flexible management and, by default, pass-through taxation, in which profits and losses are reported on members' own returns (Internal Revenue Service, n.d.). An LLC's operating agreement can set voting and profit sharing however members choose.

Cooperative: a business owned by and operated for the benefit of those who use its services, in which profits are distributed among members and each member typically has one vote regardless of how many shares they hold (U.S. Small Business Administration, n.d.). Cooperatives formed as corporations also provide limited liability. The cooperative form matches Riverside's democratic culture and is familiar to agricultural lenders and grant programs.

What this page is doingEntity types are compared on the factors that matter for this business, with sources, before one is recommended. Entity sections that describe types generically without applying them are a common reason D078 Task 2 is returned.
3

Recommended Entity

Riverside should incorporate as a cooperative under Michigan law. It provides the limited liability the expansion requires, preserves the one-member-one-vote governance members value, allows profits to be returned to members based on their use of the store, and positions the group for agricultural grants and lenders that work with cooperatives. An LLC would also protect members and is a reasonable alternative if members prefer simpler formation; the key point is that the group should not expand while operating as an informal partnership. Members should consult an attorney and accountant experienced with cooperatives before filing.

Legal Considerations of the Expansion

Food safety: the commercial kitchen and store will be licensed and inspected by state and local authorities. Michigan, like most states, bases its retail food rules on the federal Food Code, a model code that sets standards for food handling, temperature control, employee health and sanitation in retail food establishments (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, n.d.). The cooperative will need a certified food safety manager, written procedures and labeling that meets requirements for prepared foods, including allergen information.

Employment: hiring employees brings obligations for payroll taxes, withholding, workers' compensation insurance, wage and hour compliance and antidiscrimination law.

Contracts: the building lease, loan and supply agreements with members should be reviewed carefully, including who bears the cost of renovations and what happens if the store closes.

Insurance: the cooperative will need general liability, product liability, property and workers' compensation coverage.

Ethical Considerations

Three ethical issues deserve attention. The first is fairness among members: larger farms will contribute more capital and products, and the bylaws should balance their contribution with the one-member-one-vote principle, for example by paying returns in proportion to sales through the store while keeping equal votes. The second is honesty with customers: the store's appeal is local, farm-fresh food, so any products sourced from outside members must be labeled clearly. The third is responsibility to the community: the building sits in a neighborhood with limited grocery access, and the cooperative can serve it well by accepting food assistance benefits and offering affordable staples, not only premium products.

Steps and Timeline

The order of steps matters, because the protection of a new entity applies only to obligations it takes on after it exists. First, within the next month, members should agree on the entity, adopt bylaws that set membership terms, voting, capital contributions and how returns are paid, and elect a board. Second, the cooperative should file its articles of incorporation with the state, obtain a federal employer identification number and open a bank account in its own name. Third, only after these steps should the board sign the lease, apply for the loan and grant, and order equipment, all in the cooperative's name rather than any individual member's. Fourth, before opening, the cooperative must obtain its food establishment license, pass inspection of the kitchen, set up payroll and purchase insurance. A realistic timeline is about four months from agreement to opening, and members should resist pressure to sign the lease first to secure the building, since doing so could leave individual members personally responsible for it.

Conclusion

Riverside Growers Market's expansion transforms its legal situation, exposing members to personal liability they did not face at a Saturday market. Forming a cooperative, or at minimum an LLC, before signing the lease protects members and fits the group's values. Meeting food safety, employment, contract and insurance requirements, and making ethical choices about fairness, honesty and community service, will give the new store a sound legal and moral foundation.

References

Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.). Business structures. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/business-structures

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). FDA Food Code. https://www.fda.gov/food/retail-food-protection/fda-food-code

U.S. Small Business Administration. (n.d.). Choose a business structure. https://www.sba.gov/business-guide/launch-your-business/choose-business-structure

What the D078 Task 2 instructions ask

The second D078 task asks you to recommend a legal structure for a business and analyze the legal and ethical issues it faces. Most versions ask you to describe the business and its plans, explain why the current arrangement no longer works, compare entity options, recommend one, discuss legal considerations and ethical issues, and set out steps with a timeline. Evaluators look for entity comparisons built on the factors that matter, such as liability, taxation, governance and the ability to raise capital, with sources such as federal small business guidance. The recommendation should fit the business's values and plans. Legal considerations need to be specific to the industry and location. Ethical issues should involve real tensions among the people involved. Steps should be in an order that protects the owners.

How this D078 Task 2 example is built

The analysis opens with the market's members, its informal cost sharing and the planned expansion. A section explains why the current arrangement may already be a general partnership and what that means for personal liability. The comparison section weighs three entity types in a table using the factors the federal government identifies. The recommendation chooses a cooperative, explaining how it preserves one-member-one-vote governance and returns profits based on use, with an LLC as an alternative. Legal considerations cover food safety rules based on the federal Food Code, employment obligations and the lease. Ethical considerations address fairness between larger and smaller farms and transparency with customers. Steps and a timeline stress forming the entity before signing the lease. Notes explain how each section answers the rubric.

Where the D078 Task 2 rubric puts the marks

D078 Task 2 aspects are judged competent, approaching competence or not evident. A business aspect asks for the organization and its plans. The current arrangement aspect rewards an explanation of the legal risks the owners face now. A comparison aspect looks for entity options weighed on relevant factors. The recommendation aspect wants an entity justified by the business's needs and values. Legal aspects check for specific laws and requirements tied to the industry and location. An ethics aspect looks for real issues with ways to address them. The steps aspect asks for an order and timeline that make sense. Evaluators notice when sources are government or legal references rather than blogs. Clarity and APA citation apply throughout the paper.

D078 Task 2 help: what sends it back

Entity analyses lose marks when options are described without comparing them to the business. Weigh each on liability, taxes, governance and capital for this organization. Some papers ignore the current arrangement, yet an informal business may already be a partnership with personal liability. Recommendations sometimes favor the most common entity without considering what the owners value. Legal sections can be generic, so name the licensing, food safety, employment or other rules that apply in the industry and state. Ethical issues may be presented as legal ones; look for fairness and transparency questions among owners, workers and customers. Steps are often out of order, and forming the entity after signing a lease leaves owners exposed. Cite official sources.

Get a D078 Task 2 example written to your instructions

Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D078 course of study. We write a custom entity and legal analysis to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.

More D078 papers

Other Business (BS) sample papers

D078 Task 2 questions, answered

Why does liability matter in D078 Task 2?

Because in a general partnership each owner can be personally responsible for the business's debts. The sample shows that the farmers face that risk if they expand without forming an entity first.

Is the D078 cooperative real?

No. Riverside Growers Market is fictional and its members are invented. The federal guidance and food safety rules cited are real, so check the laws of your own business's state.

Which laws apply in D078 Task 2?

Those tied to the business and location. The sample covers entity formation under state law, food safety licensing based on the Food Code, employment rules and the commercial lease.

Why form the entity before the lease in D078?

Because an entity protects owners only for obligations it takes on after it exists. The sample forms the cooperative first so the lease is signed by the entity, not by individual members.

Where can I find a free D078 Task 2 sample paper?

The farmers cooperative entity and legal analysis sits above with a comment on every section. Describe the business and its expansion, and your first custom D078 Task 2 paper costs nothing.