D081 Task 2 Risk and SWOT Recommendations Example

This D081 Task 2 example analyzes the two main risks a composite Wisconsin aluminum boat builder faces in entering Canada, completes a SWOT analysis and makes two recommendations. WGU D081, Innovative and Strategic Thinking, asks BS Business Management students in this second task to identify risks, assess the organization's position and recommend a strategy. The sample explains currency risk, since costs are in U.S. dollars while Canadian buyers compare prices in Canadian dollars, and dealer dependence, since buyers expect local warranty and seasonal service. Its SWOT shows durable boats, reputation and spare capacity against thin international experience and parts support. It recommends entering Ontario and Manitoba through one established partner and pricing in Canadian dollars with bank hedging, then sets aside alternatives and lists supporting actions.

CourseD081 Innovative and Strategic Thinking
TaskTask 2
Paper typeRisk analysis, SWOT and recommendations
LengthAbout 1,000 words, 3 pages
FormatAPA 7
SchoolWestern Governors University (WGU)
ProgramBS Business Management
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for D081 Task 2

1

Two Provinces, One Partner, Prices in Canadian Dollars: Risks, a SWOT Analysis and Strategic Recommendations for a Composite Wisconsin Boat Builder's Entry Into Canada

Student Name

School of Business, Western Governors University

D081: Innovative and Strategic Thinking, Task 2

Course Instructor

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title summarizes the recommended strategy in three phrases, then names the analysis behind it. The company and its figures are composites; the frameworks and research are real.
2

Two Provinces, One Partner, Prices in Canadian Dollars: Risks, a SWOT Analysis and Strategic Recommendations for a Composite Wisconsin Boat Builder's Entry Into Canada

Purpose

Northwoods Boatworks, a composite family-owned builder of aluminum fishing boats in Wisconsin, is considering entering the Canadian market. An earlier analysis found that its culture of craftsmanship and loyalty gives it a strong product story but that its habit of letting the product speak for itself, its wariness of outside expertise and a small family circle that makes every decision could slow the effort. This paper identifies two major risks of entering Canada, analyzes the company's position with a SWOT analysis and makes two strategic recommendations.

Risk One: Currency and Pricing

Northwoods' costs are in U.S. dollars, but Canadian buyers and dealers compare prices in Canadian dollars. If the U.S. dollar strengthens, a Northwoods boat priced to be competitive today could become noticeably more expensive on a Canadian dealer's floor within months, while Canadian-built competitors' prices stay stable. If Northwoods cuts prices to stay competitive, its margins shrink. Currency movements could therefore make the Canadian business unprofitable even if sales go well. The impact is significant because boats are large purchases, where a price difference of several thousand dollars can decide a sale, and because the company has thin financial reserves to absorb losses.

Risk Two: Dealer Dependence and Support

Boats are sold and serviced through dealers, and Canadian buyers expect their dealer to handle warranty repairs, parts and seasonal service. If Northwoods signs dealers who are poorly matched, undercapitalized or unenthusiastic, sales will stall. If it cannot supply parts and warranty support quickly across the border, a few unhappy customers in a small fishing community could damage the reputation the company depends on. The impact is high because Northwoods has no experience managing dealers it cannot visit easily, and because its reputation is its main competitive advantage.

What this page is doingEach risk is described with its specific impact on this company, not only named. Listing risks without explaining their consequences is a common reason D081 Task 2 is returned.
3

SWOT Analysis

SWOT sorts what a company does well or poorly inside, and what its environment offers or threatens outside, so that strategy can build on the first and guard against the second; a review of its use found that it remains widely applied but is most useful when it leads to specific strategies rather than serving as a list (Helms & Nixon, 2010).

HelpfulHarmful
InternalStrengths: welded hulls known for durability; loyal customers and word of mouth; strong dealer relationships in the Midwest; production capacity for about 400 more boats a yearWeaknesses: no international or marketing expertise; centralized family decision-making; thin financial reserves; no parts distribution outside the Midwest
ExternalOpportunities: large Canadian fishing market close to the plant; Canadian buyers already crossing the border to buy; independent Canadian dealers seeking reliable brandsThreats: exchange rate swings; established Canadian and U.S. brands with dealer networks; Canadian standards and bilingual labeling requirements; possible trade policy changes

The analysis shows that Northwoods' strengths, durability, reputation and spare capacity, match a real opportunity, but its weaknesses in international experience, marketing and parts support align with the threats of currency risk and established competition. The strategy must use the strengths while limiting exposure to those threats.

Recommendation One: Enter Gradually Through a Partner in Two Provinces

Rather than trying to cover all of Canada, Northwoods should enter Ontario and Manitoba, the provinces closest to its plant and home to existing interested customers, through a partnership with one established Canadian marine distributor that already supplies dealers and handles parts and warranty logistics. The distributor would recruit and support five to eight dealers in the first two years. This approach uses the company's strengths in product quality and dealer loyalty, addresses its weakness in managing distant dealers and parts, and reduces the dealer dependence risk. It also reflects research on internationalization, which describes firms increasing their commitment to foreign markets step by step as they gain market knowledge (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977). After two years, Northwoods can decide whether to expand to other provinces or build its own presence.

Recommendation Two: Price in Canadian Dollars and Manage Currency Risk

Northwoods should set its Canadian dealer prices in Canadian dollars, reviewed twice a year, so that dealers and buyers see stable prices, and should manage the resulting currency risk through its bank, using forward contracts to lock in exchange rates for expected Canadian revenue over the next six months. It should also build a currency buffer into its initial Canadian prices and position the product on durability and lifetime value rather than on lowest price, which reduces pressure to match competitors dollar for dollar. Competitive rivalry in a market is shaped by forces such as the bargaining power of buyers and the availability of substitutes (Porter, 2008); emphasizing a distinctive product rather than price lowers exposure to both.

Alternatives Set Aside

Selling directly to Canadian consumers online and shipping boats across the border would avoid dealer risk but would leave buyers without local service, which matters for a product that needs seasonal maintenance and warranty repairs, and would put Northwoods in competition with the dealers it hopes to recruit later. Opening a company-owned sales and service center in Ontario would give full control but would require an investment of well over a million dollars and management capacity the company does not have, exposing it to the very financial weakness the SWOT identified. The distributor partnership is less profitable per boat than either alternative, but it limits risk while the company learns the market, which is the priority for a first international move.

Supporting Actions

Both recommendations require building capabilities the SWOT identified as weaknesses: hiring a Canadian market manager, preparing bilingual product information and labels, confirming compliance with Canadian small vessel standards and inviting one experienced outside adviser to join the leadership team's discussions of the expansion. Success will be measured by boats sold in Canada, dealer satisfaction, warranty response times and the margin on Canadian sales after currency effects.

Conclusion

Currency swings and dependence on dealers are the two main risks Northwoods faces in Canada. The SWOT analysis shows a strong product and a real opportunity alongside gaps in international experience and support. Entering two provinces gradually through an established distributor, and pricing in Canadian dollars with managed currency risk, lets Northwoods grow beyond a mature home market while protecting the reputation and finances that make it successful.

References

Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis: Where are we now? Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78-93.

What the D081 Task 2 instructions ask

For the second D081 task you analyze risks, assess the organization with SWOT and recommend how to proceed. Versions usually ask for two or more risks explained in depth, a SWOT analysis, recommendations with reasons, alternatives considered and supporting actions. Evaluators look for risks explained with how they would affect the business, not just named. The SWOT should place items correctly, with strengths and weaknesses inside the company and opportunities and threats outside it, and it should be interpreted so the reader sees what it means. Recommendations need to address the risks and build on strengths while covering weaknesses. Setting aside alternatives with reasons shows that the recommendation was weighed. Supporting actions turn the recommendation into steps. Research on strategy tools and internationalization adds support.

How this D081 Task 2 example is built

The paper opens by restating the opportunity and the earlier culture analysis. Each risk has its own section explaining how it works, what it would cost and how likely it is. Currency risk shows how a stronger U.S. dollar could price boats out of range, and dealer risk explains what happens when a dealer is poorly matched or undercapitalized. The SWOT appears as a table with a paragraph that interprets it, matching strengths to the opportunity and weaknesses to the threats. Recommendation one enters two provinces through a single established partner, and recommendation two prices in Canadian dollars and manages the exposure through the company's bank. An alternatives section explains why direct online sales and a Canadian plant were set aside. Supporting actions and notes on each part close the paper.

Where the D081 Task 2 rubric puts the marks

D081 Task 2 aspects are scored competent, approaching competence or not evident. Risk aspects ask for each risk explained with its potential effect on the organization. The SWOT aspect rewards items placed correctly and specific to the company. An interpretation aspect looks for what the SWOT means for strategy. Recommendation aspects check that each recommendation addresses the risks and uses the SWOT. The alternatives aspect wants other options weighed and set aside with reasons. A supporting actions aspect asks for steps that make the recommendations workable. Evaluators notice when currency and dealer risks come with specific responses rather than general caution. Writing mechanics and APA citations are scored, and a recognized strategy source should support the SWOT method.

D081 Task 2 help: what sends it back

Risk papers lose marks when risks are named but not explained. Describe how each would affect sales, costs or reputation. SWOT analyses often mix internal and external items, such as listing a strong dollar as a weakness; keep company factors inside and market factors outside. Many papers present the SWOT and move on without interpreting it, so say what it points to. Recommendations may ignore the risks you just described, when each should answer at least one. Alternatives are frequently missing, which makes the recommendation look automatic. Supporting actions should name what must be built, such as hiring a market manager or bilingual labels. Keep the analysis consistent with Task 1, and cite sources for currency or regulatory claims.

Get a D081 Task 2 example written to your instructions

Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D081 course of study. We write a custom risk and SWOT recommendations to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.

More D081 papers

Other Business (BS) sample papers

D081 Task 2 questions, answered

How many risks does D081 Task 2 cover?

Follow your instructions. The sample analyzes two risks in depth, currency and dealer dependence, because each could decide whether the entry succeeds, and it pairs each with a specific response.

Is the D081 plan real?

No. The plan was written for the fictional boat builder from Task 1. The SWOT and strategy research it relies on is published, so apply these methods to the organization you analyzed in your first task.

How should D081 recommendations be framed?

As specific actions that answer the risks and use the SWOT. The sample's recommendations name the provinces, the partner model, the pricing currency and the hedging method.

What goes in a D081 SWOT analysis?

Strengths and weaknesses inside the company, opportunities and threats outside it, each specific to this situation. The sample follows the table with a paragraph explaining what the pattern means for entry.

Where can I find a free D081 Task 2 sample paper?

The boat builder's risk analysis, SWOT and recommendations are shown above with margin notes. Share your Task 1 analysis, and your first custom D081 Task 2 paper is drafted at no charge.