Send the exact assignment or rubric from your course of study and a custom sample written to it lands in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. D161 is WGU’s Nursing Leadership and Management Capstone course. It centers on evaluating and closing a nurse-led improvement project: results against targets, what each phase taught, and how the change will be sustained. Searches like "d161 task 2 assignment example", "D161 sample paper", and "D161 task samples" land on this page.
What D161 is really about
A capstone that reports only success is not believable, and D161 is designed to reward the opposite instinct. The student returns to the improvement project started earlier in the leadership track and asks what actually happened: whether the aim was met, which measures moved and which did not, where the plan held and where it bent. Key performance indicators carry the argument, and they must be the ones the project said it would use, compared against the baseline it recorded. The evaluator reads for an account a director could rely on. That means numbers with a stated source and period, a clear verdict on the aim, and lessons tied to specific decisions.
The course organizes the reflection by project phase: initiation, planning, implementation and evaluation. Each phase gets its own honest assessment, which usually means admitting that one phase went worse than expected and saying why. A final presentation often accompanies the report, aimed at leaders who were not involved and need the result quickly. Sustainability matters as much as outcome, since a change that depends on the student's own enthusiasm will not survive the student's graduation. Field experience hours, logs and preceptor records belong to the student and are never drafted. The samples here report on composite projects, with invented figures that are internally consistent.
What D161’s tasks ask for
The capstone’s written work, in the versions students report, pairs a final status report with a presentation. The report typically restates the problem and aim, describes what was implemented, presents results against each measure with the baseline beside it, analyzes why the results came out as they did, and reflects on successes and challenges phase by phase. Expect a section on sustaining the change and one on recommendations for the organization. The presentation condenses the same material for decision makers, usually as slides with speaker notes or a recorded talk. Evidence is expected where you interpret results against published benchmarks.
Why D161 tasks come back for revision
Final reports come back when results are reported without the baseline, which leaves the evaluator unable to judge whether anything changed. Another common return is a report that changes its measures at the end, quietly substituting a metric that moved for one that did not. The reflection aspect fails when lessons are generic, such as communication is important, instead of tied to a decision the student would make differently. Presentations are returned for too much text and no clear verdict on the first slide. Revision is routine; most notes ask for a missing comparison or a sharper lesson.
The D161 drawers
D161 Task 1 final status report example
In many versions the first part is a final report on results, KPIs and phase lessons. On request, free, 24-48h.
D161 Task 2 results presentation example
The second part typically condenses the results into slides and notes for decision makers. On request, free, 24-48h.
Your course of study shows something else?
Western Governors University revises courses; task counts and deliverables shift between terms. Send what your classroom shows and the desk matches it exactly.
Using a D161 sample the right way
Read a D161 sample for the discipline of reporting against the original aim. Notice that a missed target is named as missed and then explained, and that each phase lesson names a specific choice. Then report your own project with your own numbers, since the evaluator knows your earlier work. Send the task instructions and rubric aspects for a custom sample written to your project in 24-48h, the first one free.
How these samples are written
The discipline behind every task here: aspects are the outline, each gets its section, artifacts match their narratives, and OA courses get prep-note treatment instead, because the sit is always yours. Send your portal's rubric with a request and the sample matches it, revisions included.
D161 questions, answered
What if my project did not meet its aim?
Report it plainly and explain it. An unmet aim with a careful analysis of why, and a credible plan for what the organization should do next, is a competent capstone. What does not pass is a report that hides the shortfall or changes the measure after the fact. Evaluators read for honesty and reasoning, not for a perfect result.
Which KPIs should the report use?
The ones your project plan said it would use, compared against the baseline you recorded. You can add a balancing measure if something unexpected happened, but label it as an addition. Report each measure with its time period and data source, and keep the measurement scale the same for baseline and result so the comparison is direct.
How long should the presentation be?
Follow your instructions, but most work well at ten to fourteen slides with the verdict on the aim near the start. Put the evidence in speaker notes rather than on the slide, and end with what you are asking leaders to decide. A presentation that a busy director could follow in eight minutes is the target.