D381 Task 1 E-commerce Analytics Evaluation Example

This D381 Task 1 example evaluates the online store of a composite Boise outdoor gear retailer whose traffic held steady at about 180,000 sessions a month while conversion fell from 2.4% to 1.8%. WGU D381, E-Commerce and Marketing Analytics, asks MS Marketing students in this task to judge campaign and site performance from data and recommend improvements. The sample uses twelve months of analytics, platform reports and 400 exit survey responses. It finds that the spring campaign missed both goals because paid social took 45% of the budget and returned $1.40 per dollar, and that mobile conversion has dropped to 1.0% as shipping costs appear late in a long checkout. It recommends visible shipping costs, guest checkout, a budget shift toward search and affiliates, and controlled experiments to confirm each change.

CourseD381 E-Commerce and Marketing Analytics
TaskTask 1
Paper typeE-commerce analytics evaluation
LengthAbout 1,000 words, 3 pages
FormatAPA 7
SchoolWestern Governors University (WGU)
ProgramMS Marketing
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for D381 Task 1

1

Steady Traffic, Shrinking Orders: An E-Commerce Analytics Evaluation of Where Mobile Shoppers Leave a Composite Outdoor Gear Retailer's Store and Which Channels Bring Buyers

Student Name

School of Business, Western Governors University

D381: Digital Marketing and E-Commerce, Task 1

Course Instructor

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the puzzle the data must explain, then names the two findings the evaluation delivers. The retailer and its figures are composites; the research is real.
2

Steady Traffic, Shrinking Orders: An E-Commerce Analytics Evaluation of Where Mobile Shoppers Leave a Composite Outdoor Gear Retailer's Store and Which Channels Bring Buyers

The Retailer and the Problem

Timberline Outfitters, a composite outdoor gear retailer based in Boise, Idaho, sells tents, packs, footwear and clothing through three stores and an online store that produces 55% of revenue. Online traffic has held steady at about 180,000 sessions a month for a year, but the conversion rate has fallen from 2.4% to 1.8%. With an average order value of $118, that drop means monthly online revenue has fallen from about $509,800 to about $382,300, a loss of roughly $127,500 a month. Leadership asked for an evaluation of recent campaigns and the store itself to find out why.

Data and Approach

The evaluation uses twelve months of web analytics data covering sessions, sources, devices and funnel steps; platform reports from the paid search, paid social and email campaigns; and 400 responses to an exit survey shown to shoppers who left checkout. Digital marketing research frames performance as the result of how firms use digital channels across the whole path from awareness to purchase and retention, so a problem can sit in acquisition, on the site or after the sale (Kannan & Li, 2017). The evaluation therefore looks at both where visitors come from and what happens once they arrive.

Campaign Performance Against Goals

The spring campaign had goals of 20% more online revenue than the prior spring and a return on ad spend of at least 4 to 1. It reached neither. Paid search returned $6.20 for every dollar spent and brought visitors who converted at 3.1%. Email to existing customers converted at 4.4% at almost no cost. Paid social, which received 45% of the $90,000 budget, returned $1.40 per dollar, and its visitors converted at 0.6%. Paid social did bring many first-time visitors, but most viewed one page and left. The campaign's overall shortfall comes largely from shifting budget toward a channel that attracts browsers rather than buyers.

The Conversion Funnel

Mobile devices now account for 64% of sessions, up from 51% a year ago, while desktop sessions declined. Desktop conversion is stable at 3.3%; mobile conversion has fallen to 1.0%. The drop in overall conversion is therefore largely a mobile problem made worse by the shift in device mix.

The mobile funnel shows where shoppers leave. Of mobile sessions that add an item to the cart, 58% begin checkout, and 71% of those reach the shipping step. At the shipping step, 49% abandon, far higher than any other step and far higher than desktop's 22% at the same step. Shipping costs are displayed for the first time on that step, and the site charges $9.95 for orders under $99.

The exit survey supports the pattern: the most common reason given for leaving was unexpected shipping cost, followed by the need to create an account and a payment form that was hard to use on a phone. This matches large-scale checkout research, in which extra costs such as shipping are the reason shoppers most often give for abandoning an order (Baymard Institute, n.d.).

What this page is doingThe evaluation locates the problem in the data, the mobile shipping step, before recommending anything, and each finding is supported by two sources. Evaluations that recommend changes without showing where the funnel breaks are a common reason D381 is returned.
3

Acquisition Channels

Channels differ sharply in the quality of visitors they bring. Paid search and email visitors arrive with intent, often searching for a specific product. Organic search brings steady traffic that converts at 2.5%. Paid social brings the most new visitors but, at 0.6% conversion, costs about $84 per order against an average order value of $118, leaving little margin after product costs. Referral traffic from two hiking blogs is small but converts at 3.8%, suggesting an opportunity.

Recommendations

Show shipping costs on the product page and in the cart, and test a lower free shipping threshold of $75, since most abandoned carts sit between $60 and $99.

Offer guest checkout and digital wallet payments on mobile, removing the account step and the long card form.

Move 20 percentage points of the paid social budget to paid search and to affiliate partnerships with outdoor blogs, and use the remaining paid social budget for retargeting visitors who viewed products rather than for broad reach.

Grow the email list with a gear checklist for trips such as a first backpacking weekend, since email is the best converting channel and costs least.

Add a retention step: a post-purchase email series with care tips and a review request, which strengthens repeat purchase.

Testing Plan

Each change will be tested rather than assumed. Controlled online experiments, in which visitors are randomly assigned to the current and changed versions of a page, are the most reliable way to learn whether a change causes an improvement, and practitioners stress running them long enough, checking that assignment works as intended and choosing one main metric in advance (Kohavi et al., 2020). Timberline will test the shipping display and threshold first, measuring mobile conversion and profit per session, since a lower threshold could raise orders while lowering margin. Guest checkout will follow, then the channel budget shift, evaluated over a full month against the prior month and the same month last year.

Expected Impact and Limits

If mobile conversion recovered only to 1.6%, still well below desktop, overall conversion would return to about 2.2% and monthly online revenue would rise by roughly $87,000. The estimates have limits. Analytics tools attribute each sale to a channel using rules that can understate channels that introduce shoppers who buy later, so paid social's contribution may be larger than its last-click figures show; the retargeting test will help reveal it. Privacy settings also reduce tracking, and survey respondents may not represent all shoppers who left. Findings should be updated as test results arrive.

Conclusion

Timberline's traffic has not fallen; its ability to turn mobile visitors into buyers has. Shipping costs revealed late in a hard-to-use mobile checkout, and a campaign budget weighted toward a channel that brings browsers, explain most of the lost revenue. Fixing the mobile checkout, rebalancing channels and testing each change should restore conversion and give the retailer a clearer view of what works.

References

Baymard Institute. (n.d.). Cart abandonment rate statistics. Retrieved September 29, 2026, from https://baymard.com/lists/cart-abandonment-rate

Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. (2017). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 22-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006

Kohavi, R., Tang, D., & Xu, Y. (2020). Trustworthy online controlled experiments: A practical guide to A/B testing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108653985

What the D381 Task 1 instructions ask

D381 opens with an evaluation of e-commerce and campaign performance. You are usually given or choose a business, then assess campaign results against goals, analyze the conversion funnel, compare acquisition channels, recommend changes and explain how you will test them. Evaluators look for metrics interpreted rather than listed, which means saying what each number means for revenue. The funnel analysis should locate the step where customers leave, supported by data, and the channel comparison should weigh cost against the quality of visitors each channel brings. Recommendations need to follow directly from those findings. A testing plan with a single main metric and a comparison group shows you understand that a change must be proven before it is rolled out. Limitations, such as attribution rules, deserve a sentence or two.

How this D381 Task 1 example is built

The evaluation opens with the retailer, its three stores and the online share of revenue, then converts the conversion drop into lost monthly revenue. A data section names every source and explains why the whole path from awareness to repeat purchase is examined. Campaign results are set against the two spring goals, with return on ad spend by channel. The funnel section separates desktop from mobile and follows mobile shoppers step by step to the point where shipping costs appear. Channel analysis compares conversion and cost per order. Recommendations are numbered and tied to findings, such as a $75 free shipping threshold because most abandoned carts sit between $60 and $99. The testing plan, expected impact and a note on attribution limits close the paper.

Where the D381 Task 1 rubric puts the marks

Evaluators mark every D381 Task 1 aspect competent, approaching competence or not evident. A campaign aspect asks whether results are compared with stated goals using the right metrics. The funnel aspect looks for the drop-off point identified with evidence, and splitting results by device is the kind of detail evaluators credit. A channel aspect wants acquisition sources compared on quality and cost, not just volume. Recommendation aspects reward changes that answer specific findings. The testing aspect asks for a method, such as controlled experiments, with a main metric chosen in advance. An impact aspect expects a reasoned estimate of results with its limits stated. The last aspects judge clarity and APA referencing, and practitioner sources such as checkout usability studies count when cited properly.

D381 Task 1 help: what sends it back

Analytics papers often lose marks by reporting metrics without interpreting them. After each number, say what it means for the business. Another frequent gap is treating overall conversion as one figure when device, channel or campaign splits would show where the problem lives. Recommendations sometimes drift into general advice, such as improving the website, so name the page, the change and the finding behind it. Testing plans can skip the comparison group or change several things at once; test one change at a time against the current version. Impact estimates may be too optimistic, so show the arithmetic and use a modest assumption. Attribution deserves a caution, since last-click reports undercount channels that introduce shoppers. Cite research for your methods, not only for background.

Get a D381 Task 1 example written to your instructions

Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D381 course of study. We write a custom e-commerce analytics evaluation to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.

Other MBA sample papers

D381 Task 1 questions, answered

What is cart abandonment in D381?

When a shopper adds items to the cart but leaves before paying. The sample traces where mobile shoppers abandon checkout and links the largest drop to shipping costs shown only at the shipping step.

Is the D381 retailer real?

No. Timberline Outfitters is a composite created for this sample, and its figures are illustrative. The research on digital marketing, checkout usability and online experiments is real and cited.

Why test changes in D381?

Because a change that seems obvious may not work. Controlled experiments assign visitors at random to the old and new versions, so the sample can show whether each fix actually raises conversion.

What metrics matter in a D381 funnel analysis?

Conversion at each step, split by device and channel, plus return on ad spend and cost per order. The sample uses these to show that mobile checkout, not traffic, explains the revenue drop.

Where can I find a free D381 Task 1 sample paper?

The outdoor retailer's analytics evaluation is shown above with notes on every section. Tell us the business and data you are analyzing, and your first custom D381 evaluation is on us.