| Course | C210 Management and Leadership Capstone |
|---|---|
| Task | Task 1 |
| Paper type | Capstone annotated bibliography |
| Length | About 1,000 words, 2 pages |
| Format | APA 7 |
| School | Western Governors University (WGU) |
| Program | MS Management and Leadership |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for C210 Task 1
Eighteen Sources, Nine Courses, One Program: An Annotated Bibliography for a Management and Leadership Development Program for Frontline Managers at a Composite Regional Hospital
Student Name
School of Business, Western Governors University
C210: Management and Leadership Capstone, Task 1
Course Instructor
Month Day, Year
Eighteen Sources, Nine Courses, One Program: An Annotated Bibliography for a Management and Leadership Development Program for Frontline Managers at a Composite Regional Hospital
Purpose
This annotated bibliography gathers two scholarly sources for each course in the management and leadership program to inform a development program for frontline managers at Lakeview Regional Medical Center, a composite 420-bed hospital. Most of its 58 frontline managers, charge nurses promoted to nurse managers and supervisors in pharmacy, imaging and environmental services, were promoted for technical skill and received two days of orientation. Each entry summarizes the source, evaluates its method and strength, and notes its relevance to the program. Sources were chosen for quality first, favoring meta-analyses, systematic reviews and well-designed field studies, and for their fit with the problems Lakeview's managers face: turnover, safety culture, constant change and the shift from doing the work to leading others.
Managing Organizations and Leading People
Judge and Piccolo (2004). This meta-analysis compared transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership as predictors of follower job satisfaction, follower motivation and ratings of the leader. Transformational leadership and contingent reward were both strongly related to outcomes, and each predicted beyond the other. The large pooled sample makes it strong evidence, though most studies used ratings from the same followers for leadership and outcomes. Relevance: the program should teach both transformational behaviors and fair, consistent recognition.
Eva et al. (2019). This systematic review of two decades of servant leadership research proposes a definition, reviews measures and summarizes outcomes, which include trust, engagement and helping behavior. As a review rather than a meta-analysis, it summarizes rather than quantifies effects. Relevance: servant leadership fits health care's service culture and gives new managers a frame for supporting staff.
Managing Human Capital
Hom et al. (2017). This review traces a century of turnover research, from early practical methods to theories of job attitudes, alternatives and embeddedness. It is authoritative but broad. Relevance: the program should teach managers the drivers of turnover they control, such as treatment, scheduling and development.
Locke and Latham (2002). This review of 35 years of goal-setting research shows that specific, difficult goals produce higher performance than vague ones, with feedback and commitment as moderators. The evidence base is large and consistent. Relevance: managers need skill in setting and following up on goals with staff.
Becoming an Effective Leader
Smither et al. (2005). This meta-analysis of multisource feedback found generally small improvements after feedback, larger when recipients saw a need to change, reacted positively and set goals. Relevance: the program can use 360-degree feedback, but only paired with coaching and goal setting.
Ang et al. (2007). This article developed and validated a four-factor measure of cultural intelligence and linked its dimensions to decision making, adaptation and task performance. The validation studies used student and professional samples, which limits generalizability somewhat. Relevance: Lakeview's workforce and patients are diverse, and managers need to adapt across cultures.
Management Communication
Coombs (2007). This article presents situational crisis communication theory, matching response strategies to how much responsibility stakeholders assign an organization. It is a conceptual framework supported by experimental studies. Relevance: frontline managers are first to communicate with staff and families after adverse events.
Bloom et al. (2024). This randomized trial of hybrid work at a large company found that two days a week of remote work reduced quitting by a third with no loss in performance or promotion. A strong design in one firm and country. Relevance: for nonclinical departments, flexible scheduling is a retention tool managers should understand.
Leading Teams
Edmondson (1999). This field study of 51 teams linked psychological safety to learning behavior and, through it, to team performance. A foundational, well-designed study. Relevance: safety culture in hospitals depends on staff raising concerns, so managers must build psychological safety.
Mathieu et al. (2008). This review organizes a decade of team research into inputs, mediating processes and outcomes. It is comprehensive but general. Relevance: it gives the program a framework for diagnosing unit team problems.
Ethical Leadership
Brown et al. (2005). This study defined ethical leadership, developed a measure and linked it to follower outcomes including satisfaction, dedication and willingness to report problems to management. Its multiple studies strengthen the measure. Relevance: willingness to report problems is essential for patient safety.
Ng and Feldman (2015). This meta-analysis found ethical leadership related to followers' attitudes, behavior and performance, with some effects beyond other leadership styles. Relevance: it supports teaching ethical leadership as a distinct skill, not a subset of other styles.
Data-Driven Decision Making
Brynjolfsson and McElheran (2016). Using Census data on manufacturing plants, the authors found data-driven decision making nearly tripled from 2005 to 2010 and was associated with complements such as information technology and educated workers. The setting is manufacturing, not health care. Relevance: managers need skills to use unit dashboards, not only access to them.
Pfeffer and Sutton (2006). This article argues that managers should base decisions on the best evidence rather than habit or imitation, and describes barriers to doing so. It is a persuasive essay rather than a study. Relevance: it supports teaching managers to question practices with data.
Change Management and Innovation
Kotter (1995). This article describes eight errors that cause transformation efforts to fail, from lacking urgency to declaring victory too soon. It is based on consulting experience rather than systematic data. Relevance: managers lead constant change, such as new equipment and workflows, and need a practical model.
Oreg et al. (2011). This review of 60 years of quantitative studies on change recipients' reactions identifies antecedents such as participation, communication and trust. It is broad and rigorous. Relevance: it shows managers how to reduce resistance by involving staff.
Strategic Management
Porter (2008). This article explains how five competitive forces shape industry profitability. It is a classic framework, less directly applicable to nonprofit hospitals. Relevance: it helps managers understand the hospital's competitive position in outpatient services.
Desmidt et al. (2011). Pooling two decades of studies, this meta-analysis found that mission statements carry a modest financial payoff, with estimates that shift depending on how each study measured statements and results. Relevance: managers should connect daily work to the hospital's mission, since statements matter most when used.
References
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00082.x
Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630(8018), 920-925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2
Brown, M. E., TreviƱo, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. American Economic Review, 106(5), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161016
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
Desmidt, S., Prinzie, A., & Decramer, A. (2011). Looking for the value of mission statements: A meta-analysis of 20 years of research. Management Decision, 49(3), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111120806
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530-545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 948-965. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038246
Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients' reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396550
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 62-74.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78-93.
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x
What the C210 Task 1 instructions ask
The first C210 task asks you to compile an annotated bibliography for your capstone. You will usually gather scholarly sources, often a set number for each course in the program, and write annotations that summarize, evaluate and explain each source's use. Evaluators look for sources that are scholarly and relevant, annotations that go beyond summary to judge quality and fit, a clear link to the capstone project and correct APA formatting. Annotations that only restate abstracts, or sources chosen without regard to the project, is likely to come back on the evaluation aspects. Mixing classic works with recent research shows both depth and currency. Check the number of sources required for each course before you begin.
How this C210 Task 1 example is built
The bibliography opens with a short purpose statement naming the project and the audience. Sources are grouped under course names, so evaluators can see coverage. Each annotation has three parts in a short paragraph: what the source did and found, how strong it is and what its limits are, and how it will shape the development program. The sample notes study designs, such as meta-analyses and field studies, since design affects how much weight a source deserves. References follow APA format. The notes explain how each annotation meets the task and why some classic sources are kept alongside newer ones. Each annotation stays under a paragraph.
Where the C210 Task 1 rubric puts the marks
C210 Task 1 aspects are rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. A sources aspect asks whether sources are scholarly and relevant. A coverage aspect rewards the required number across courses. A summary aspect looks for accurate descriptions. An evaluation aspect wants each source's quality and limits judged. A relevance aspect asks how each source will inform the capstone. A formatting aspect covers APA style. Evaluators notice when annotations mention study design and when the purpose statement ties the sources together. Current sources, alongside foundational ones, show a strong search. Annotations of similar length and structure make the bibliography easy to read. A purpose statement that names the project gives the list its point. Sources with DOIs, where available, let evaluators check each quickly.
C210 Task 1 help: what sends it back
C210 bibliographies lose marks when annotations restate abstracts. Add your judgment of quality and explain how the source will be used. Sources may be popular articles rather than scholarly ones; use peer-reviewed research and respected books. Coverage can be uneven, so meet the required number for each course. Formatting errors are common, so check APA rules for each source type. Last, write a purpose statement that names your capstone project, since evaluators want to see that the sources were chosen for it. Note each source's design, such as meta-analysis or field study, since design affects how much weight it deserves. Keep annotations concise; a short paragraph is enough. Explain limits honestly, such as a source that predates remote work, so your project uses each source appropriately.
Get a C210 Task 1 example written to your instructions
Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your C210 course of study. We write a custom annotated bibliography to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.
More C210 papers
Other MBA sample papers
- D374 Task 2 Survey and Focus Group Design
- D379 Task 1 Social Media Strategy
- C203 Task 1 Personal Leadership Profile
- D552 Task 1 Accounting Data Presentation
C210 Task 1 questions, answered
How many C210 sources are needed?
Check your instructions. The sample includes eighteen, two for each of nine courses, so every part of the program informs the capstone project. Check your instructions. Coverage matters.
Can C210 use books?
Yes, if they are scholarly or widely respected in the field and your instructions allow. Most sources in the sample are peer-reviewed articles, with classic works included where they remain influential.
What goes in a C210 annotation?
A summary of the source, an evaluation of its quality and limits, and an explanation of how it will inform your capstone project, usually in one short paragraph.
Is the C210 hospital real?
No. The regional hospital and its development program are made up to illustrate the task. The eighteen sources annotated are real and can be checked. Choose a project from your own field.
Where can I find a free C210 Task 1 sample paper?
All eighteen annotations are reproduced above, grouped by course, with notes on how each was judged. Tell us your capstone project, and your first custom C210 bibliography is written free.