D375 Task 1 Creative Brief and Brand Alignment Example

This D375 Task 1 example writes a creative brief and a brand alignment analysis for a composite Portland coffee roaster that buys directly from four farming cooperatives but whose packaging shows a generic leaf instead of proof. WGU D375, Marketing Communications and Storytelling, asks MS Marketing students in this task to plan communications that express a brand's positioning and check whether its touchpoints agree. The sample describes the brand, then presents a brief with an objective of 20% more grocery sales of four single-origin coffees, audience, insight, message and tone. It explains why consumers discount sustainability claims, what brand equity the brief aims to build and where packaging falls out of alignment, then recommends bags built around a farmer or cooperative and a three-month test in 15 stores.

CourseD375 Marketing Communications and Storytelling
TaskTask 1
Paper typeCreative brief and brand alignment analysis
LengthAbout 1,000 words, 3 pages
FormatAPA 7
SchoolWestern Governors University (WGU)
ProgramMS Marketing
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for D375 Task 1

1

Show the Farm, Not the Leaf: A Creative Brief and Brand Alignment Analysis for a Composite Direct-Trade Coffee Roaster Whose Packaging Promises More Than It Proves

Student Name

School of Business, Western Governors University

D375: Marketing Communications and Storytelling, Task 1

Course Instructor

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the creative direction in five words, contrasting proof with generic green imagery, then names the two parts of the task and the problem the analysis finds. The roaster is a composite; the research is real.
2

Show the Farm, Not the Leaf: A Creative Brief and Brand Alignment Analysis for a Composite Direct-Trade Coffee Roaster Whose Packaging Promises More Than It Proves

The Brand and Its Positioning

Ridgeline Roasters, a composite small-batch roaster in Portland, Oregon, buys green coffee directly from four farming cooperatives in Colombia, Ethiopia, Guatemala and Peru, paying prices well above commodity rates under multiyear agreements. It roasts in small batches and sells through its website, two cafes and about 60 grocery stores in the Pacific Northwest. Its intended positioning is: for coffee drinkers who care where their coffee comes from, Ridgeline is the roaster that proves its relationships with the farmers who grow it, so every cup is both excellent and fairly sourced.

The company wants to grow grocery sales, where it competes on a crowded shelf with national specialty brands and many roasters that also claim sustainability. Its grocery sales have been flat for two years.

Creative Brief

Objective: increase grocery sales of Ridgeline's four single-origin coffees by 20% over the next year by making the brand's direct relationships with farmers visible and credible at the shelf and online.

Target audience: adults aged 28 to 50 in the Pacific Northwest who buy specialty coffee at the grocery store, value ethical sourcing and are willing to pay more for it, but who are skeptical of vague sustainability claims because so many brands make them.

Consumer insight: these shoppers want their morning coffee to reflect values they are proud of, but they have learned to distrust green labels and leaf icons that promise sustainability without proof. They will pay for ethical coffee only when they believe the claim is real.

Key message: Ridgeline knows the farmers by name, and you can too.

Support: named cooperatives and farmers on every bag; the price paid per pound compared with the commodity price; multiyear contracts; photographs and short stories from each farm; roast dates to show freshness.

Tone: warm, specific and honest; proud without preaching; never vague.

Deliverables: redesigned packaging for four single-origin coffees, shelf signage for grocery partners, and a brand story and short video for social media and the website.

What this page is doingThe brief is built on a specific consumer insight that shapes the message, support and tone. Briefs with generic insights, such as customers want quality coffee, are a common reason D375 Task 1 is returned.
3

Why the Insight Matters

Sustainability claims are everywhere in coffee, and many consumers have learned to discount them. Research on greenwashing describes it as misleading consumers about environmental performance or the environmental benefits of a product, and notes that its growing incidence can undermine consumer confidence in green products generally (Delmas & Burbano, 2011). For a roaster whose practices are genuinely ethical, this skepticism is a problem and an opportunity: Ridgeline cannot win by claiming sustainability more loudly, but it can win by proving it more specifically than competitors.

What the Brief Is Trying to Build

The brief aims at a specific kind of brand value. Customer-based brand equity arises when consumers hold associations with a brand that are strong, favorable and unique (Keller, 1993). Ridgeline's association with ethical sourcing is favorable among the people who know it, but it is not strong, because few grocery shoppers have heard it, and not unique, because every competitor claims something similar. Naming farmers and showing prices makes the association unique; repeating it across packaging, signage and video makes it strong. The creative work therefore has a clear job: turn a claim many brands make into a proof only Ridgeline can offer.

Brand Alignment Analysis

Brand alignment asks whether every element a customer encounters expresses the brand's positioning consistently. Packaging is especially important for a grocery brand because it communicates identity at the moment of choice; research on packaging describes it as a vehicle for brand identity that shapes consumers' lived experience with the product at the shelf and at home (Underwood, 2003).

Ridgeline's current packaging is poorly aligned with its positioning. The bags are kraft paper with a green leaf logo and the words Sustainably Sourced, which look almost identical to competitors' bags making weaker claims. The cooperatives are not named. The price paid to farmers, the brand's most powerful proof, appears nowhere. Roast dates are printed small on the bottom. The website tells farmer stories well, but nothing on the bag invites shoppers to find them.

Other elements are better aligned. The cafes display photographs from the farms and baristas can talk about each cooperative. Social media posts from harvest visits perform well. The brand's strength is real but invisible in the channel where it most needs to grow.

Recommended Changes

Redesign each single-origin bag around a farmer or cooperative: a photograph, the cooperative's name and region, and a short line such as We paid $4.10 a pound, more than twice the commodity price. Replace the generic leaf and Sustainably Sourced wording with this specific proof. Print the roast date prominently. Add a short link and scannable code on each bag leading to that farm's story and video. Use shelf signage in grocery stores that repeats the farmer photograph and price, so the proof is visible from the aisle. Keep the kraft material, which signals craft, but add a distinctive color band for each origin so the line is recognizable as a family.

Measuring the Effect

The redesign will be tested before a full rollout. Ridgeline will introduce the new bags in 15 of its 60 grocery stores for three months, keeping the old bags in the rest, and compare unit sales, the share of first-time buyers who purchase again and the number of shoppers who scan the code to read farm stories. A short shelf-intercept survey in test stores will ask shoppers what they believe about the brand's sourcing, which shows whether the proof is registering. If the new packaging lifts sales and belief in the test stores, the company will roll it out to all stores and extend the approach to its blends.

Conclusion

Ridgeline's ethical sourcing is its strongest brand asset, but its packaging hides it behind the same vague green cues competitors use. A creative brief built on shoppers' distrust of empty claims, and packaging that names farmers and shows the price paid, will align the brand's most visible element with its positioning and give skeptical shoppers a reason to believe.

References

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64-87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101

Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2003.11501933

What the D375 Task 1 instructions ask

The first D375 task asks you to write a creative brief and analyze brand alignment. You will usually describe the brand and positioning, write a brief with objective, audience, insight, message and deliverables, explain the reasoning behind it, assess whether brand touchpoints align with the positioning and recommend changes with a way to measure them. Evaluators look for a brief concise enough to guide creative work, an insight grounded in research about the audience, an alignment analysis that examines actual touchpoints and recommendations that close specific gaps. A brief that lists everything the brand wants to say, without one clear message, will not meet the brief aspects.

How this D375 Task 1 example is built

The paper opens with the roaster, its sourcing and its position against larger brands. The creative brief is presented in its usual format, with short labeled sections. A section explains why the insight matters, drawing on research about greenwashing and consumer skepticism. Another explains the brand equity the brief aims to build. The alignment analysis examines packaging, website and in-store displays against the positioning and identifies where they fall short. Recommended changes are specific, such as naming the cooperative and region on each bag. The measurement section describes a test in some stores with others as a comparison. The brief itself stays under a page, so the reasoning sits in the sections around it.

Where the D375 Task 1 rubric puts the marks

D375 Task 1 aspects are rated competent, approaching competence or not evident. A brand aspect asks for positioning described. A brief aspect rewards a complete, concise brief with one clear message. An insight aspect looks for audience understanding supported by research. An alignment aspect wants touchpoints assessed against positioning. A recommendations aspect asks for changes that close gaps. A measurement aspect looks for how effects will be tested. Evaluators notice when the brief could be handed to a designer and used, and they expect branding and consumer research to be cited. An insight aspect is rated competent when the insight states a tension in the buyer's mind, here wanting to trust sustainability claims while doubting most of them, rather than a demographic fact. Graders also look for a measurement plan that names the metric before the test begins.

D375 Task 1 help: what sends it back

D375 briefs lose marks when they carry several messages. Choose one and support it. Insights may be assumptions; ground them in research or customer data. The alignment analysis can be general, so examine specific touchpoints and quote what they say. Recommendations may be vague, such as refresh packaging; describe what changes and why. Measurement is often missing, so propose a test with a comparison. Last, keep the brief short, since its purpose is to guide others quickly. Writers also confuse the objective with the message. The objective is what the campaign should change, such as trial among shoppers who buy specialty coffee; the message is the one thing those shoppers should believe. In the alignment analysis, rate each touchpoint against the positioning in the same order, so gaps are easy to compare, and cite the research that shows why vague green claims backfire.

Get a D375 Task 1 example written to your instructions

Send the task instructions and rubric aspects from your D375 course of study. We write a custom creative brief and brand alignment to those exact aspects, returned in 24-48h. The first custom sample is free.

More D375 papers

Other MBA sample papers

D375 Task 1 questions, answered

What goes in a D375 creative brief?

The objective, target audience, key insight, single message, tone, deliverables and measures. The sample presents each in a short labeled section a designer could use.

Is the D375 roaster real?

No. Ridgeline Roasters is made up to illustrate the task. The research on brand equity and sustainability claims cited in the analysis is real. Use the brand your own course or workplace provides.

What is brand alignment in D375?

Consistency between a brand's positioning and every touchpoint customers encounter, such as packaging, website and displays. The sample finds packaging out of step with the roaster's direct-trade story.

How does the D375 sample measure the change?

By introducing new bags in 15 of 60 grocery stores for three months and comparing sales with stores that keep the old bags. The comparison stores show whether sales change because of the bags or because of the season.

Where can I find a free D375 Task 1 sample paper?

The coffee roaster brief and alignment analysis are published above with notes. Tell us the brand you are working with, and your first custom D375 paper is free.